From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:21:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-16-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for SRCU.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +-
include/linux/srcu.h | 61 +++++++++++++------
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 24 ++++++++
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index a14d796bcd0e..918e35d110df 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`).
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index d7ba46e74f58..fde8bba191a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/rcu_segcblist.h>
-struct srcu_struct;
+struct_with_capability(srcu_struct);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
-int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
#define __srcu_read_lock_lite __srcu_read_lock
#define __srcu_read_unlock_lite __srcu_read_unlock
#else // #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
-int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
#endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
@@ -110,14 +110,16 @@ static inline bool same_state_synchronize_srcu(unsigned long oldstate1, unsigned
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
-int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
#else
static inline int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+ __acquires_shared(ssp)
{
return __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
}
static inline void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
+ __releases_shared(ssp)
{
__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
}
@@ -189,6 +191,14 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+/*
+ * No-op helper to denote that ssp must be held. Because SRCU-protected pointers
+ * should still be marked with __rcu_guarded, and we do not want to mark them
+ * with __guarded_by(ssp) as it would complicate annotations for writers, we
+ * choose the following strategy: srcu_dereference_check() calls this helper
+ * that checks that the passed ssp is held, and then fake-acquires 'RCU'.
+ */
+static inline void __srcu_read_lock_must_hold(const struct srcu_struct *ssp) __must_hold_shared(ssp) { }
/**
* srcu_dereference_check - fetch SRCU-protected pointer for later dereferencing
@@ -202,9 +212,15 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
* to 1. The @c argument will normally be a logical expression containing
* lockdep_is_held() calls.
*/
-#define srcu_dereference_check(p, ssp, c) \
- __rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu), \
- (c) || srcu_read_lock_held(ssp), __rcu)
+#define srcu_dereference_check(p, ssp, c) \
+({ \
+ __srcu_read_lock_must_hold(ssp); \
+ __acquire_shared_cap(RCU); \
+ __auto_type __v = __rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu), \
+ (c) || srcu_read_lock_held(ssp), __rcu); \
+ __release_shared_cap(RCU); \
+ __v; \
+})
/**
* srcu_dereference - fetch SRCU-protected pointer for later dereferencing
@@ -247,7 +263,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
* invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the matching srcu_read_lock()
* from another.
*/
-static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+ __acquires_shared(ssp)
{
int retval;
@@ -274,7 +291,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
* where RCU is watching, that is, from contexts where it would be legal
* to invoke rcu_read_lock(). Otherwise, lockdep will complain.
*/
-static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+ __acquires_shared(ssp)
{
int retval;
@@ -295,7 +313,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
* then none of the other flavors may be used, whether before, during,
* or after.
*/
-static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+ __acquires_shared(ssp)
{
int retval;
@@ -307,7 +326,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp
/* Used by tracing, cannot be traced and cannot invoke lockdep. */
static inline notrace int
-srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+ __acquires_shared(ssp)
{
int retval;
@@ -337,7 +357,8 @@ srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
* Calls to srcu_down_read() may be nested, similar to the manner in
* which calls to down_read() may be nested.
*/
-static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+ __acquires_shared(ssp)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
@@ -352,7 +373,7 @@ static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
* Exit an SRCU read-side critical section.
*/
static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
- __releases(ssp)
+ __releases_shared(ssp)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
@@ -368,7 +389,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
* Exit a light-weight SRCU read-side critical section.
*/
static inline void srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
- __releases(ssp)
+ __releases_shared(ssp)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE);
@@ -384,7 +405,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
* Exit an SRCU read-side critical section, but in an NMI-safe manner.
*/
static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
- __releases(ssp)
+ __releases_shared(ssp)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NMI);
@@ -394,7 +415,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
/* Used by tracing, cannot be traced and cannot call lockdep. */
static inline notrace void
-srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
+srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp)
{
srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
@@ -409,7 +430,7 @@ srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
* the same context as the maching srcu_down_read().
*/
static inline void srcu_up_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
- __releases(ssp)
+ __releases_shared(ssp)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 050fa7c9fcba..63d81ad1562f 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
/*
* Test that helper macros work as expected.
@@ -345,3 +346,26 @@ static void __used test_rcu_assert_variants(void)
lockdep_assert_in_rcu_read_lock_sched();
wants_rcu_held_sched();
}
+
+struct test_srcu_data {
+ struct srcu_struct srcu;
+ long __rcu_guarded *data;
+};
+
+static void __used test_srcu(struct test_srcu_data *d)
+{
+ init_srcu_struct(&d->srcu);
+
+ int idx = srcu_read_lock(&d->srcu);
+ long *data = srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
+ (void)data;
+ srcu_read_unlock(&d->srcu, idx);
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(d->data, NULL);
+}
+
+static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
+{
+ guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
+ (void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
+}
--
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 8:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 9:13 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 0:03 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05 9:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-16-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox