public inbox for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,  Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,  linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2025 10:21:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-16-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>

Add support for Clang's capability analysis for SRCU.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 .../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst         |  2 +-
 include/linux/srcu.h                          | 61 +++++++++++++------
 lib/test_capability-analysis.c                | 24 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index a14d796bcd0e..918e35d110df 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
 
 Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
 `raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`).
 
 For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
 calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index d7ba46e74f58..fde8bba191a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/rcu_segcblist.h>
 
-struct srcu_struct;
+struct_with_capability(srcu_struct);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
 void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,
 		void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
 void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
-int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
 #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
 #define __srcu_read_lock_lite __srcu_read_lock
 #define __srcu_read_unlock_lite __srcu_read_unlock
 #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
-int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
 #endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_SRCU
 void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
 
@@ -110,14 +110,16 @@ static inline bool same_state_synchronize_srcu(unsigned long oldstate1, unsigned
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
-int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
-void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
+int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp);
 #else
 static inline int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	return __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
 }
 static inline void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
 }
@@ -189,6 +191,14 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
+/*
+ * No-op helper to denote that ssp must be held. Because SRCU-protected pointers
+ * should still be marked with __rcu_guarded, and we do not want to mark them
+ * with __guarded_by(ssp) as it would complicate annotations for writers, we
+ * choose the following strategy: srcu_dereference_check() calls this helper
+ * that checks that the passed ssp is held, and then fake-acquires 'RCU'.
+ */
+static inline void __srcu_read_lock_must_hold(const struct srcu_struct *ssp) __must_hold_shared(ssp) { }
 
 /**
  * srcu_dereference_check - fetch SRCU-protected pointer for later dereferencing
@@ -202,9 +212,15 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
  * to 1.  The @c argument will normally be a logical expression containing
  * lockdep_is_held() calls.
  */
-#define srcu_dereference_check(p, ssp, c) \
-	__rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu), \
-				(c) || srcu_read_lock_held(ssp), __rcu)
+#define srcu_dereference_check(p, ssp, c)					\
+({										\
+	__srcu_read_lock_must_hold(ssp);					\
+	__acquire_shared_cap(RCU);						\
+	__auto_type __v = __rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu),	\
+				(c) || srcu_read_lock_held(ssp), __rcu);	\
+	__release_shared_cap(RCU);						\
+	__v;									\
+})
 
 /**
  * srcu_dereference - fetch SRCU-protected pointer for later dereferencing
@@ -247,7 +263,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
  * invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the matching srcu_read_lock()
  * from another.
  */
-static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -274,7 +291,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * where RCU is watching, that is, from contexts where it would be legal
  * to invoke rcu_read_lock().  Otherwise, lockdep will complain.
  */
-static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -295,7 +313,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * then none of the other flavors may be used, whether before, during,
  * or after.
  */
-static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -307,7 +326,8 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp
 
 /* Used by tracing, cannot be traced and cannot invoke lockdep. */
 static inline notrace int
-srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	int retval;
 
@@ -337,7 +357,8 @@ srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * Calls to srcu_down_read() may be nested, similar to the manner in
  * which calls to down_read() may be nested.
  */
-static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
+static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+	__acquires_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
@@ -352,7 +373,7 @@ static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
  * Exit an SRCU read-side critical section.
  */
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
@@ -368,7 +389,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
  * Exit a light-weight SRCU read-side critical section.
  */
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE);
@@ -384,7 +405,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
  * Exit an SRCU read-side critical section, but in an NMI-safe manner.
  */
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NMI);
@@ -394,7 +415,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
 
 /* Used by tracing, cannot be traced and cannot call lockdep. */
 static inline notrace void
-srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
+srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL);
 	__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
@@ -409,7 +430,7 @@ srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
  * the same context as the maching srcu_down_read().
  */
 static inline void srcu_up_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-	__releases(ssp)
+	__releases_shared(ssp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 050fa7c9fcba..63d81ad1562f 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
 
 /*
  * Test that helper macros work as expected.
@@ -345,3 +346,26 @@ static void __used test_rcu_assert_variants(void)
 	lockdep_assert_in_rcu_read_lock_sched();
 	wants_rcu_held_sched();
 }
+
+struct test_srcu_data {
+	struct srcu_struct srcu;
+	long __rcu_guarded *data;
+};
+
+static void __used test_srcu(struct test_srcu_data *d)
+{
+	init_srcu_struct(&d->srcu);
+
+	int idx = srcu_read_lock(&d->srcu);
+	long *data = srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
+	(void)data;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&d->srcu, idx);
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(d->data, NULL);
+}
+
+static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
+{
+	guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
+	(void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
+}
-- 
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04  9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05  8:36   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05  9:13     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05  9:27       ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05  0:03     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05  9:15   ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05  9:26     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43   ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-16-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox