public inbox for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,  Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,  linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2025 10:21:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-20-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>

Add support for Clang's capability analysis for local_lock_t.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 .../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst         |  2 +-
 include/linux/local_lock.h                    | 18 ++++----
 include/linux/local_lock_internal.h           | 41 ++++++++++++++---
 lib/test_capability-analysis.c                | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 7e4d94d65043..e892a5292841 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
 
 Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
 `raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`.
 
 For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
 calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
index 091dc0b6bdfb..63fadcf66216 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
@@ -51,12 +51,12 @@
 #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)			\
 	__local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
 
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu*,
-	     local_lock(_T),
-	     local_unlock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu*,
-	     local_lock_irq(_T),
-	     local_unlock_irq(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu,
+		    local_lock(_T->lock),
+		    local_unlock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu,
+		    local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
+		    local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
 		    local_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
 		    local_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
 #define local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock)				\
 	__local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock)
 
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu*,
-	     local_lock_nested_bh(_T),
-	     local_unlock_nested_bh(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu,
+		    local_lock_nested_bh(_T->lock),
+		    local_unlock_nested_bh(_T->lock))
 
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 420866c1c70b..01830f75d9a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -10,12 +10,13 @@
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
 
-typedef struct {
+struct_with_capability(local_lock) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 	struct lockdep_map	dep_map;
 	struct task_struct	*owner;
 #endif
-} local_lock_t;
+};
+typedef struct local_lock local_lock_t;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 # define LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname)		\
@@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ do {								\
 			      0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV,	\
 			      LD_LOCK_PERCPU);			\
 	local_lock_debug_init(lock);				\
+	__assert_cap(lock);					\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock)				\
@@ -73,40 +75,47 @@ do {								\
 			      0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV,	\
 			      LD_LOCK_NORMAL);			\
 	local_lock_debug_init(lock);				\
+	__assert_cap(lock);					\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock(lock)					\
 	do {							\
 		preempt_disable();				\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock_irq(lock)					\
 	do {							\
 		local_irq_disable();				\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
 	do {							\
 		local_irq_save(flags);				\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock(lock)					\
 	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
 		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
 		preempt_enable();				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_irq(lock)				\
 	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
 		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
 		local_irq_enable();				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)			\
 	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
 		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
 		local_irq_restore(flags);			\
 	} while (0)
@@ -115,19 +124,37 @@ do {								\
 	do {							\
 		lockdep_assert_in_softirq();			\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));	\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock)				\
-	local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
+		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+	} while (0)
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
 
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
 /*
  * On PREEMPT_RT local_lock maps to a per CPU spinlock, which protects the
  * critical section while staying preemptible.
  */
 typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 
+/*
+ * Because the compiler only knows about the base per-CPU variable, use this
+ * helper function to make the compiler think we lock/unlock the @base variable,
+ * and hide the fact we actually pass the per-CPU instance @pcpu to lock/unlock
+ * functions.
+ */
+static inline local_lock_t *__local_lock_alias(local_lock_t __percpu *base, local_lock_t *pcpu)
+	__returns_cap(base)
+{
+	return pcpu;
+}
+
 #define INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lockname) __LOCAL_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED((lockname))
 
 #define __local_lock_init(l)					\
@@ -138,7 +165,7 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 #define __local_lock(__lock)					\
 	do {							\
 		migrate_disable();				\
-		spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock)));		\
+		spin_lock(__local_lock_alias(__lock, this_cpu_ptr((__lock)))); \
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock_irq(lock)			__local_lock(lock)
@@ -152,7 +179,7 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 
 #define __local_unlock(__lock)					\
 	do {							\
-		spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock)));		\
+		spin_unlock(__local_lock_alias(__lock, this_cpu_ptr((__lock)))); \
 		migrate_enable();				\
 	} while (0)
 
@@ -163,12 +190,12 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 #define __local_lock_nested_bh(lock)				\
 do {								\
 	lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func();			\
-	spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock));				\
+	spin_lock(__local_lock_alias(lock, this_cpu_ptr(lock))); \
 } while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock)				\
 do {								\
-	spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((lock)));			\
+	spin_unlock(__local_lock_alias(lock, this_cpu_ptr((lock)))); \
 } while (0)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 7ccb163ab5b1..81c8e74548a9 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@
 
 #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/build_bug.h>
+#include <linux/local_lock.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
@@ -433,3 +435,47 @@ static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
 	guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
 	(void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
 }
+
+struct test_local_lock_data {
+	local_lock_t lock;
+	int counter __guarded_by(&lock);
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct test_local_lock_data, test_local_lock_data) = {
+	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+};
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_init(struct test_local_lock_data *d)
+{
+	local_lock_init(&d->lock);
+	d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_lock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+	local_lock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+	local_lock_irqsave(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock_irqrestore(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+
+	local_lock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_guard(void)
+{
+	{ guard(local_lock)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+	{ guard(local_lock_irq)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+	{ guard(local_lock_irqsave)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+	{ guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+}
-- 
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04  9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05  8:36   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05  9:13     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05  9:27       ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05  0:03     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05  9:15   ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05  9:26     ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43   ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-20-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox