From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:21:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-20-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for local_lock_t.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +-
include/linux/local_lock.h | 18 ++++----
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 41 ++++++++++++++---
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 7e4d94d65043..e892a5292841 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
index 091dc0b6bdfb..63fadcf66216 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
@@ -51,12 +51,12 @@
#define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
__local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu*,
- local_lock(_T),
- local_unlock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu*,
- local_lock_irq(_T),
- local_unlock_irq(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu,
+ local_lock(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu,
+ local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
local_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
local_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
#define local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock) \
__local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock)
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu*,
- local_lock_nested_bh(_T),
- local_unlock_nested_bh(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu,
+ local_lock_nested_bh(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(_T->lock))
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 420866c1c70b..01830f75d9a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -10,12 +10,13 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
-typedef struct {
+struct_with_capability(local_lock) {
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
struct task_struct *owner;
#endif
-} local_lock_t;
+};
+typedef struct local_lock local_lock_t;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# define LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname) \
@@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ do { \
0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
LD_LOCK_PERCPU); \
local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
+ __assert_cap(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock) \
@@ -73,40 +75,47 @@ do { \
0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
LD_LOCK_NORMAL); \
local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
+ __assert_cap(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock(lock) \
do { \
preempt_disable(); \
local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irq(lock) \
do { \
local_irq_disable(); \
local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
do { \
local_irq_save(flags); \
local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock(lock) \
do { \
+ __release(lock); \
local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
preempt_enable(); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_irq(lock) \
do { \
+ __release(lock); \
local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
local_irq_enable(); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
do { \
+ __release(lock); \
local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
@@ -115,19 +124,37 @@ do { \
do { \
lockdep_assert_in_softirq(); \
local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock) \
- local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+ do { \
+ __release(lock); \
+ local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ } while (0)
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
/*
* On PREEMPT_RT local_lock maps to a per CPU spinlock, which protects the
* critical section while staying preemptible.
*/
typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
+/*
+ * Because the compiler only knows about the base per-CPU variable, use this
+ * helper function to make the compiler think we lock/unlock the @base variable,
+ * and hide the fact we actually pass the per-CPU instance @pcpu to lock/unlock
+ * functions.
+ */
+static inline local_lock_t *__local_lock_alias(local_lock_t __percpu *base, local_lock_t *pcpu)
+ __returns_cap(base)
+{
+ return pcpu;
+}
+
#define INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lockname) __LOCAL_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED((lockname))
#define __local_lock_init(l) \
@@ -138,7 +165,7 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
#define __local_lock(__lock) \
do { \
migrate_disable(); \
- spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock))); \
+ spin_lock(__local_lock_alias(__lock, this_cpu_ptr((__lock)))); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irq(lock) __local_lock(lock)
@@ -152,7 +179,7 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
#define __local_unlock(__lock) \
do { \
- spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock))); \
+ spin_unlock(__local_lock_alias(__lock, this_cpu_ptr((__lock)))); \
migrate_enable(); \
} while (0)
@@ -163,12 +190,12 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
#define __local_lock_nested_bh(lock) \
do { \
lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func(); \
- spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ spin_lock(__local_lock_alias(lock, this_cpu_ptr(lock))); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock) \
do { \
- spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((lock))); \
+ spin_unlock(__local_lock_alias(lock, this_cpu_ptr((lock)))); \
} while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 7ccb163ab5b1..81c8e74548a9 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@
#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
+#include <linux/local_lock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
@@ -433,3 +435,47 @@ static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
(void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
}
+
+struct test_local_lock_data {
+ local_lock_t lock;
+ int counter __guarded_by(&lock);
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct test_local_lock_data, test_local_lock_data) = {
+ .lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+};
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_init(struct test_local_lock_data *d)
+{
+ local_lock_init(&d->lock);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock(void)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_lock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+ local_lock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+ local_lock_irqsave(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_guard(void)
+{
+ { guard(local_lock)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+ { guard(local_lock_irq)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+ { guard(local_lock_irqsave)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+ { guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+}
--
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 8:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 9:13 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 0:03 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05 9:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-20-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox