From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-21-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for ww_mutex.
The programming model for ww_mutex is subtly more complex than other
locking primitives when using ww_acquire_ctx. Encoding the respective
pre-conditions for ww_mutex lock/unlock based on ww_acquire_ctx state
using Clang's capability analysis makes incorrect use of the API harder.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v2:
* New patch.
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 3 +-
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 21 ++++--
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index e892a5292841..51ea94b0f4cc 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`,
+`ww_mutex`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index 45ff6f7a872b..e1d5455bd075 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct ww_class {
unsigned int is_wait_die;
};
-struct ww_mutex {
+struct_with_capability(ww_mutex) {
struct WW_MUTEX_BASE base;
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx;
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct ww_mutex {
#endif
};
-struct ww_acquire_ctx {
+struct_with_capability(ww_acquire_ctx) {
struct task_struct *task;
unsigned long stamp;
unsigned int acquired;
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct ww_acquire_ctx {
*/
static inline void ww_mutex_init(struct ww_mutex *lock,
struct ww_class *ww_class)
+ __asserts_cap(lock)
{
ww_mutex_base_init(&lock->base, ww_class->mutex_name, &ww_class->mutex_key);
lock->ctx = NULL;
@@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ static inline void ww_mutex_init(struct ww_mutex *lock,
*/
static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
struct ww_class *ww_class)
+ __acquires(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
ctx->task = current;
ctx->stamp = atomic_long_inc_return_relaxed(&ww_class->stamp);
@@ -179,6 +181,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
* data structures.
*/
static inline void ww_acquire_done(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __releases(ctx) __acquires_shared(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
lockdep_assert_held(ctx);
@@ -196,6 +199,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_done(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
* mutexes have been released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __releases_shared(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
mutex_release(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
@@ -245,7 +249,8 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
*
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
-extern int /* __must_check */ ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
+extern int /* __must_check */ ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(0, lock) __must_hold(ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_interruptible - acquire the w/w mutex, interruptible
@@ -278,7 +283,8 @@ extern int /* __must_check */ ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acq
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(0, lock) __must_hold(ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_slow - slowpath acquiring of the w/w mutex
@@ -305,6 +311,7 @@ extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
*/
static inline void
ww_mutex_lock_slow(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __acquires(lock) __must_hold(ctx) __no_capability_analysis
{
int ret;
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
@@ -342,6 +349,7 @@ ww_mutex_lock_slow(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
static inline int __must_check
ww_mutex_lock_slow_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(0, lock) __must_hold(ctx)
{
#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!ctx->contending_lock);
@@ -349,10 +357,11 @@ ww_mutex_lock_slow_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
return ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(lock, ctx);
}
-extern void ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock);
+extern void ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock) __releases(lock);
extern int __must_check ww_mutex_trylock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ __cond_acquires(true, lock) __must_hold(ctx);
/***
* ww_mutex_destroy - mark a w/w mutex unusable
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 81c8e74548a9..853fdc53840f 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
+#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
/*
* Test that helper macros work as expected.
@@ -479,3 +480,67 @@ static void __used test_local_lock_guard(void)
{ guard(local_lock_irqsave)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
{ guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
}
+
+static DEFINE_WD_CLASS(ww_class);
+
+struct test_ww_mutex_data {
+ struct ww_mutex mtx;
+ int counter __guarded_by(&mtx);
+};
+
+static void __used test_ww_mutex_init(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
+{
+ ww_mutex_init(&d->mtx, &ww_class);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_noctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
+{
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock(&d->mtx, NULL)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->mtx, NULL)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (ww_mutex_trylock(&d->mtx, NULL)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&d->mtx, NULL);
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+}
+
+static void __used test_ww_mutex_lock_ctx(struct test_ww_mutex_data *d)
+{
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
+
+ ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &ww_class);
+
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock(&d->mtx, &ctx)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (!ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->mtx, &ctx)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ if (ww_mutex_trylock(&d->mtx, &ctx)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+ }
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&d->mtx, &ctx);
+ d->counter++;
+ ww_mutex_unlock(&d->mtx);
+
+ ww_acquire_done(&ctx);
+ ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
+}
--
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 8:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 9:13 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 0:03 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05 9:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-21-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox