From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: replace capable() with file_ns_capable()
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 12:25:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025060848-exact-sasquatch-a899@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250607134114.21899-1-pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 07:11:14PM +0530, Pranav Tyagi wrote:
> The TIOCCONS ioctl currently uses capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to check for
> privileges, which validates the current task's credentials. Since this
> ioctl acts on an open file descriptor, the check should instead use the
> file opener's credentials.
>
> Replace capable() with file_ns_capable() to ensure the capability is
> checked against file->f_cred in the correct user namespace. This
> prevents unintended privilege escalation and aligns with best practices
> for secure ioctl implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/156
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> index e2d92cf70eb7..ee0df35d65c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/termios_internal.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/cred.h>
> +#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
> +#include <linux/capability.h>
>
> #include <linux/kbd_kern.h>
> #include <linux/vt_kern.h>
> @@ -2379,7 +2382,7 @@ static int tiocswinsz(struct tty_struct *tty, struct winsize __user *arg)
> */
> static int tioccons(struct file *file)
> {
> - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + if (!file_ns_capable(file, file->f_cred->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
As you now are affecting the user/kernel api here, how was this tested
and are you _SURE_ this is the correct thing to be doing? Did you audit
all userspace users of this ioctl that you can find (i.e. a Debian code
search) to verify that they can handle this change in behaviour?
I need a lot of assurances before being able to take a change like this,
for obvious reasons.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-08 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-07 13:41 [PATCH] tty: replace capable() with file_ns_capable() Pranav Tyagi
2025-06-08 10:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-06-13 13:53 ` Pranav Tyagi
2025-06-17 12:04 ` David Laight
2025-06-18 6:32 ` Pranav Tyagi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025060848-exact-sasquatch-a899@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).