From: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: "Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@siemens.com>,
Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] tty: n_gsm: fix gsm_queue() UAF and add a base regression test
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 10:32:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616173240.3665059-1-bestswngs@gmail.com> (raw)
The receive worker walks gsm->dlci[] without gsm->mutex while a
concurrent GSMIOC_SETCONF -> gsm_cleanup_mux() frees the DLCIs, so the
control handlers can dereference a freed gsm_dlci. v1's NULL check only
narrowed the window; v2 fixes the use-after-free itself.
The fix pins each DLCI the dispatch dereferences with its existing
tty_port reference (option 2), so the data path stays lock-free. See the
patch 1 commit message for details, including why the late destructor
uses cmpxchg() so it cannot wipe a re-created mux (Daniel's teardown
concern).
Changes since v1:
- Fix the UAF by reference-pinning instead of a NULL check in the
handlers; no gsm->mutex in the data path (Greg, Daniel).
- Pin every DLCI the dispatch touches, not just the addressed one:
MSC/RLS/PN operate on gsm->dlci[k] named in the payload.
- Add a base selftest (patch 2), as Greg asked.
Verification (KASAN, panic_on_warn=1): the originally reported splat is
the gsm_control_reply() / CMD_TEST path (see the Link in patch 1). A
reproducer targeting the MSC handler crashes the unpatched kernel and
survives 270 race rounds on v2. The selftest passes on both the clean
and patched kernel (pass:3 fail:0 skip:0).
Weiming Shi (2):
tty: n_gsm: fix use-after-free in gsm_queue() control frame dispatch
selftests: tty: add base regression test for n_gsm line discipline
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 105 +++++-
tools/testing/selftests/tty/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/tty/config | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_n_gsm_test.c | 344 +++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_n_gsm_test.c
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 17:32 Weiming Shi [this message]
2026-06-16 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tty: n_gsm: fix use-after-free in gsm_queue() control frame dispatch Weiming Shi
2026-06-16 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests: tty: add base regression test for n_gsm line discipline Weiming Shi
2026-06-17 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] tty: n_gsm: fix gsm_queue() UAF and add a base regression test Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616173240.3665059-1-bestswngs@gmail.com \
--to=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.starke@siemens.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox