Linux Serial subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bradley Morgan" <brads@mainlining.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] tty: sc16is7xx: convert to kthread_run_worker
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 09:40:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905094036.2E7811F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <946a190a64560bbb192d03f5757b8349b97157f9.1788513591.git.brads@mainlining.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The explicitly allocated kthread worker is destroyed before the devm-managed threaded IRQ handler is freed, causing a Use-After-Free.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Closing any single port cancels the shared polling timer, starving all other active ports on the same multi-port chip.
--

commit 3bc3e4920cc0fac18e8f989a3296c6b4222d065c
Author: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>

tty: sc16is7xx: convert to kthread_run_worker
    
Convert sc16is7xx to use kthread_run_worker() instead of the
deprecated kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn) pattern. The new API sets
worker->task before the worker starts.

> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> index 7107a0fb1e7bb..2cfc1f2900091 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> @@ -1186,7 +1185,7 @@ static void sc16is7xx_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
>  	if (s->polling)
>  		kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&s->poll_work);
>  
> -	kthread_flush_worker(&s->kworker);
> +	kthread_flush_worker(s->kworker);
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does closing any single port cancel the
shared polling timer for all ports?

In polling mode, s->poll_work is shared across all ports on the chip. If
one port is closed, sc16is7xx_shutdown() unconditionally cancels s->poll_work,
which seems to starve any other active ports on the same chip.

> @@ -1705,8 +1702,8 @@ void sc16is7xx_remove(struct device *dev)
>  	if (s->polling)
>  		kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&s->poll_work);
>  
> -	kthread_flush_worker(&s->kworker);
> -	kthread_stop(s->kworker_task);
> +	kthread_flush_worker(s->kworker);
> +	kthread_destroy_worker(s->kworker);
>  
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(s->clk);
>  }

[Severity: High]
Can kthread_destroy_worker() lead to a use-after-free if the threaded IRQ
handler fires concurrently?

The driver uses devm_request_threaded_irq() in sc16is7xx_probe() to manage its
interrupt, meaning the IRQ handler remains active until after
sc16is7xx_remove() returns and devres cleans it up.

If an interrupt fires or an in-flight threaded IRQ executes in parallel right
after kthread_destroy_worker() frees s->kworker, the IRQ handler could call
functions like sc16is7xx_ier_clear() which enqueue work:

drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c:sc16is7xx_ier_clear() {
    ...
    kthread_queue_work(s->kworker, &one->reg_work);
}

This would dereference the freed s->kworker pointer. Previously kworker was
embedded in the sc16is7xx_port struct, so stopping the task was safe from a
use-after-free, but now kthread_destroy_worker() frees the dynamically
allocated worker before the IRQ handler is disabled.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788513591.git.brads@mainlining.org?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-05  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04  9:37 [PATCH v2 0/5] kthread: convert remaining users to kthread_create_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04  9:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] media: ivtv: convert to kthread_run_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 10:44   ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05  9:51     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] net: encx24j600: " Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05  9:54     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: convert to kthread_create_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tty: sc16is7xx: convert to kthread_run_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05  9:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-05  9:51     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] kthread: remove worker->task self assignment Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05  9:50     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 14:37   ` kernel test robot
2026-09-05 14:50     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 15:11   ` kernel test robot
2026-09-04 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] kthread: convert remaining users to kthread_create_worker Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-04 15:56   ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 21:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-04 21:13       ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 11:19         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-05 12:55           ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 17:10             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-05 17:56               ` Bradley Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260905094036.2E7811F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=brads@mainlining.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox