From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bradley Morgan" <brads@mainlining.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] tty: sc16is7xx: convert to kthread_run_worker
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 09:40:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905094036.2E7811F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <946a190a64560bbb192d03f5757b8349b97157f9.1788513591.git.brads@mainlining.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The explicitly allocated kthread worker is destroyed before the devm-managed threaded IRQ handler is freed, causing a Use-After-Free.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Closing any single port cancels the shared polling timer, starving all other active ports on the same multi-port chip.
--
commit 3bc3e4920cc0fac18e8f989a3296c6b4222d065c
Author: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
tty: sc16is7xx: convert to kthread_run_worker
Convert sc16is7xx to use kthread_run_worker() instead of the
deprecated kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn) pattern. The new API sets
worker->task before the worker starts.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> index 7107a0fb1e7bb..2cfc1f2900091 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> @@ -1186,7 +1185,7 @@ static void sc16is7xx_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> if (s->polling)
> kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&s->poll_work);
>
> - kthread_flush_worker(&s->kworker);
> + kthread_flush_worker(s->kworker);
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does closing any single port cancel the
shared polling timer for all ports?
In polling mode, s->poll_work is shared across all ports on the chip. If
one port is closed, sc16is7xx_shutdown() unconditionally cancels s->poll_work,
which seems to starve any other active ports on the same chip.
> @@ -1705,8 +1702,8 @@ void sc16is7xx_remove(struct device *dev)
> if (s->polling)
> kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&s->poll_work);
>
> - kthread_flush_worker(&s->kworker);
> - kthread_stop(s->kworker_task);
> + kthread_flush_worker(s->kworker);
> + kthread_destroy_worker(s->kworker);
>
> clk_disable_unprepare(s->clk);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can kthread_destroy_worker() lead to a use-after-free if the threaded IRQ
handler fires concurrently?
The driver uses devm_request_threaded_irq() in sc16is7xx_probe() to manage its
interrupt, meaning the IRQ handler remains active until after
sc16is7xx_remove() returns and devres cleans it up.
If an interrupt fires or an in-flight threaded IRQ executes in parallel right
after kthread_destroy_worker() frees s->kworker, the IRQ handler could call
functions like sc16is7xx_ier_clear() which enqueue work:
drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c:sc16is7xx_ier_clear() {
...
kthread_queue_work(s->kworker, &one->reg_work);
}
This would dereference the freed s->kworker pointer. Previously kworker was
embedded in the sc16is7xx_port struct, so stopping the task was safe from a
use-after-free, but now kthread_destroy_worker() frees the dynamically
allocated worker before the IRQ handler is disabled.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788513591.git.brads@mainlining.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 9:37 [PATCH v2 0/5] kthread: convert remaining users to kthread_create_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] media: ivtv: convert to kthread_run_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 10:44 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 9:51 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] net: encx24j600: " Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 9:54 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: convert to kthread_create_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tty: sc16is7xx: convert to kthread_run_worker Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 9:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-05 9:51 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] kthread: remove worker->task self assignment Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 9:50 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 14:37 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-05 14:50 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 15:11 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-04 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] kthread: convert remaining users to kthread_create_worker Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-04 15:56 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-04 21:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-04 21:13 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 11:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-05 12:55 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-05 17:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-05 17:56 ` Bradley Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260905094036.2E7811F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox