From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] serial: abort TIOCMIWAIT on hangup
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:20:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910132029.D80801F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910130816.642699-5-johan@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The `TIOCMIWAIT` implementation in `drivers/tty/mxser.c` suffers from the exact same missing hangup check as `serial_core.c`, causing indefinite sleep on hangup.
- [High] The `TIOCMIWAIT` loop in `drivers/tty/amiserial.c` is fundamentally broken, instantly returns `-EIO` without waiting, and lacks a hangup check.
--
commit a8c074101564c35207f8f5e3fb06b52d01a55d88
Author: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Subject: serial: abort TIOCMIWAIT on hangup
The commit adds a missing hangup check to the TIOCMIWAIT wait loop in
serial_core.c to avoid indefinite sleep.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904115542.E20D11F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index f7b30f77b2312..33c8f3b6ac816 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -1244,6 +1244,11 @@ static int uart_wait_modem_status(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *sta
> break;
> }
>
> + if (tty_io_error(tty)) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + break;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the TIOCMIWAIT implementation
in drivers/tty/mxser.c suffers from the exact same missing hangup check,
causing indefinite sleep on hangup.
In drivers/tty/mxser.c:mxser_cflags_changed(), the condition for
wait_event_interruptible() is evaluated without checking for a hangup:
ret = ((arg & TIOCM_RNG) && (cnow.rng != cprev->rng)) ||
((arg & TIOCM_DSR) && (cnow.dsr != cprev->dsr)) ||
((arg & TIOCM_CD) && (cnow.dcd != cprev->dcd)) ||
((arg & TIOCM_CTS) && (cnow.cts != cprev->cts));
Does mxser.c also need a tty_io_error() check here to prevent the process
from going back to sleep indefinitely instead of aborting when woken on
hangup?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the TIOCMIWAIT loop in
drivers/tty/amiserial.c is fundamentally broken, instantly returning
-EIO without waiting, and lacks a hangup check.
In drivers/tty/amiserial.c:rs_ioctl(), cprev is captured right before
the wait loop. Immediately inside the loop, cnow is captured again and
checked:
cnow = info->icount; /* atomic copy */
local_irq_restore(flags);
if (cnow.rng == cprev.rng && cnow.dsr == cprev.dsr &&
cnow.dcd == cprev.dcd && cnow.cts == cprev.cts) {
ret = -EIO; /* no change => error */
break;
}
Because the copies happen almost back-to-back, the counters will almost
always be identical on the first iteration before schedule() is ever
called, causing an instant failure instead of waiting.
Should this faulty check be removed, and a proper hangup check like the
one you're adding in this patch be included instead?
> schedule();
>
> /* see if a signal did it */
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910130816.642699-1-johan@kernel.org?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 13:08 [PATCH v4 0/4] serial: fix ioctl hangup race Johan Hovold
2026-09-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] serial: revert guards in uart_wait_modem_status() Johan Hovold
2026-09-10 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] serial: fix ioctl hangup race Johan Hovold
2026-09-10 13:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] serial: fix TIOCMIWAIT race Johan Hovold
2026-09-10 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] serial: abort TIOCMIWAIT on hangup Johan Hovold
2026-09-10 13:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910132029.D80801F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox