From: henrymei <ljp1205831794@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>,
TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: keep DLCI 0 object across mux restarts
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:58:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911065826.3515170-1-henrymei@tencent.com> (raw)
From: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
gsmtty_install() takes a reference on the object occupying the
gsm->dlci[0] slot, and gsmtty_cleanup() drops a reference on whatever
object occupies the slot at cleanup time. The two are expected to
balance on the same object, but gsm_activate_mux() breaks that: on a
mux restart (GSMIOC_SETCONF with a need_restart change) it
unconditionally allocates a fresh DLCI 0 into the slot, orphaning the
old object which still has install-time references outstanding.
When the last of those old gsmttys is closed, gsmtty_cleanup() then
drops its slot reference on the *new* DLCI 0, driving its base kref
from 1 to 0: gsm_dlci_free() frees it and NULLs the slot while the
mux stays alive (dead == false), and the old object is leaked. The
next gsmtty open passes the dead check and dereferences the NULL slot
in gsmtty_install() (dlci_get(gsm->dlci[0])), crashing the kernel.
Keep the DLCI 0 object in the slot on reactivation when one is still
present: it can only still be there because open gsmttys hold
references on it, and gsm_dlci_free() is the only code that clears the
slot and only runs at kref 0, so the slot identity can no longer
change while install-time references are outstanding. Re-take the base
reference that gsm_cleanup_mux() dropped via gsm_dlci_release(), clear
the dead flag it set, and refresh the per-object config fields exactly
like a fresh gsm_dlci_alloc() would, since the restart may carry a
config change.
This also restores the invariant that dead == false implies
gsm->dlci[0] != NULL, making the NULL dereference structurally
impossible.
Fixes: 6ab8fba7fcb0 ("tty: n_gsm: Added refcount usage to gsm_mux and gsm_dlci structs")
Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: CodeBuddy:Kimi-K3
Signed-off-by: Aohan Mei <henrymei@tencent.com>
---
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
index c13e050de83b..2ca7e18addc5 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
@@ -3186,7 +3186,29 @@ static int gsm_activate_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
int ret;
- dlci = gsm_dlci_alloc(gsm, 0);
+ dlci = gsm->dlci[0];
+ if (dlci) {
+ /*
+ * gsmtty_install() takes a reference on the object that
+ * occupies the dlci[0] slot and gsmtty_cleanup() drops a
+ * reference on the object occupying the slot at cleanup
+ * time. Replacing the object here while such references
+ * are still outstanding makes the cleanup reference drop
+ * on the wrong (new) object, freeing it prematurely, and
+ * leaks the old one. Keep the still-referenced object in
+ * the slot and re-take the base reference that
+ * gsm_cleanup_mux() dropped so the install and cleanup
+ * references always balance on the same object.
+ */
+ dlci_get(dlci);
+ dlci->dead = false;
+ dlci->adaption = gsm->adaption;
+ dlci->mtu = gsm->mtu;
+ dlci->ftype = gsm->ftype;
+ dlci->k = gsm->k;
+ } else {
+ dlci = gsm_dlci_alloc(gsm, 0);
+ }
if (dlci == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.7
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 6:58 henrymei [this message]
2026-09-11 7:17 ` [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: keep DLCI 0 object across mux restarts sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 7:56 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911065826.3515170-1-henrymei@tencent.com \
--to=ljp1205831794@gmail.com \
--cc=corvus@tencent.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=henrymei@tencent.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox