From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] serial: mid8250: select CONFIG_RATIONAL Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: <28108741.gZodRCNg2d@wuerfel> References: <1447688894-2936779-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1447688894-2936779-4-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1447692962.31665.145.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1447692962.31665.145.camel@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heikki Krogerus List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Monday 16 November 2015 18:56:02 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 16:48 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The Intel MID support got split out from the PCI 8250 driver, > > and that now causes a build error when no other driver selects > > CONFIG_RATIONAL: > > Already published. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/12/272 > > It's not first time you send patches that already have been published. > > I think you use some testing automation which doesn't take into > consideration what is sent in mailing lists. Correct, it also ignores whatever patches other people have in private git trees, in their mail clients or in their heads. I try to send patches for things that break either on the first day they are broken so mine comes first, or I wait a while to see if a fix ends up in linux-next to give everyone else a chance to get their patch into next so I can catch it on a rebase. Arnd