From: Tapio Reijonen <tapio.reijonen@vaisala.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: max310x: improve interrupt handling
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:23:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3424939f-3abc-4154-9cda-51abd657e889@vaisala.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903113731.24f5ac2499e92246bc0c93eb@hugovil.com>
Hi,
On 9/3/25 18:37, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2025 09:23:04 +0000
> Tapio Reijonen <tapio.reijonen@vaisala.com> wrote:
>
>> When there is a heavy load of receiving characters to all
>> four UART's, the warning 'Hardware RX FIFO overrun' is
>> sometimes detected.
>> The current implementation always service first UART3 until
>> no more interrupt and then service another UARTs.
>
> To improve clarity and reduce confusion, maybe change to
> something like:
>
> ... always service first the highest UART until
> no more interrupt and then service another UART (ex: UART3 will be
> serviced for as long as there are interrupts for it, then UART2, etc).
>
>
>>
>> This commit improve interrupt service routine to handle all
>> interrupt sources, e.g. UARTs when a global IRQ is detected.
>
> The current code already handle all interrupt sources. What you
> maybe could be saying is that you handle all individual interrupt
> sources before reading the global IRQ register again?
>
> You could also add in your commit message that your modification has the
> nice side-effect of improving the efficiency of the driver by reducing
> the number of reads of the global IRQ register.
>
>
Try to improve commit message in next patch version.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tapio Reijonen <tapio.reijonen@vaisala.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
>> index ce260e9949c3c268e706b2615d6fc01adc21e49b..3234ed7c688ff423d25a007ed8b938b249ae0b82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
>> @@ -824,15 +824,26 @@ static irqreturn_t max310x_ist(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>
>> if (s->devtype->nr > 1) {
>> do {
>> - unsigned int val = ~0;
>> + unsigned int val;
>> + unsigned int global_irq = ~0;
>> + int port;
>>
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(regmap_read(s->regmap,
>> - MAX310X_GLOBALIRQ_REG, &val));
>> - val = ((1 << s->devtype->nr) - 1) & ~val;
>> + MAX310X_GLOBALIRQ_REG, &global_irq));
>
> You changed the indentation here...
>
I'll fix the indentation, my fault.
>> +
>> + val = ((1 << s->devtype->nr) - 1) & ~global_irq;
>> +
>> if (!val)
>> break;
>> - if (max310x_port_irq(s, fls(val) - 1) == IRQ_HANDLED)
>> - handled = true;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + port = fls(val) - 1;
>> + if (max310x_port_irq(s, port) == IRQ_HANDLED)
>> + handled = true;
>> +
>> + global_irq |= 1 << port;
>> + val = ((1 << s->devtype->nr) - 1) & ~global_irq;
>> + } while (val);
>> } while (1);
>> } else {
>> if (max310x_port_irq(s, 0) == IRQ_HANDLED)
>
> Maybe you could simplify (and improve readability) with this instead:
>
I am reviewing the proposal.
> ---
> val = ((1 << s->devtype->nr) - 1) & ~val;
> if (!val)
> break;
>
> - if (max310x_port_irq(s, fls(val) - 1) == IRQ_HANDLED)
> - handled = true;
> +
> + do {
> + unsigned int channel;
> +
> + channel = fls(val) - 1;
> +
> + if (max310x_port_irq(s, channel) == IRQ_HANDLED)
> + handled = true;
> +
> + val &= ~(1 << channel);
> + } while (val);
> ---
>
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: c8bc81a52d5a2ac2e4b257ae123677cf94112755
>> change-id: 20250903-master-max310x-improve-interrupt-handling-aa22b7ba1c1d
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Tapio Reijonen <tapio.reijonen@vaisala.com>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Hugo Villeneuve
--
Many thanks,
Tapio Reijonen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-04 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 9:23 [PATCH] serial: max310x: improve interrupt handling Tapio Reijonen
2025-09-03 15:37 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2025-09-04 7:23 ` Tapio Reijonen [this message]
2025-09-04 7:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-09-04 11:50 ` Tapio Reijonen
2025-09-04 16:36 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2025-09-05 5:11 ` Tapio Reijonen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3424939f-3abc-4154-9cda-51abd657e889@vaisala.com \
--to=tapio.reijonen@vaisala.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hugo@hugovil.com \
--cc=hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shc_work@mail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox