? .libs ? Makefile ? Makefile.in ? aclocal.m4 ? config.cache ? config.log ? config.status ? configure ? libtool ? ser2net ? .deps/controller.P ? .deps/dataxfer.P ? .deps/devcfg.P ? .deps/readconfig.P ? .deps/selector.P ? .deps/ser2net.P ? .deps/telnet.P ? .deps/utils.P Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/ser2net/ser2net/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.36 diff -u -r1.36 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 14 Oct 2003 20:52:13 -0000 1.36 +++ ChangeLog 4 Dec 2003 17:31:04 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,11 @@ +2003-12-04 Corey Minyard + + * dataxfer.c: Have the telnet option responses use the 1xx + responses to the com port control options. I believe this is + wrong, but it is consistent with other products already in the + field. + 2003-10-14 Corey Minyard * configure.in: Moved to version 2.0. Index: dataxfer.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/ser2net/ser2net/dataxfer.c,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -r1.28 dataxfer.c --- dataxfer.c 14 Oct 2003 20:52:13 -0000 1.28 +++ dataxfer.c 4 Dec 2003 17:31:04 -0000 @@ -2000,7 +2000,7 @@ } get_rate_from_baud_rate(val, &val); outopt[0] = 44; - outopt[1] = 1; + outopt[1] = 101; *((uint32_t *) (outopt+2)) = htonl(val); telnet_send_option(&port->tn_data, outopt, 6); break; @@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ } } outopt[0] = 44; - outopt[1] = 2; + outopt[1] = 102; outopt[2] = val; telnet_send_option(&port->tn_data, outopt, 3); break; @@ -2061,7 +2061,7 @@ val = 1; /* NONE */ } outopt[0] = 44; - outopt[1] = 3; + outopt[1] = 103; outopt[2] = val; telnet_send_option(&port->tn_data, outopt, 3); break; @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ val = 1; /* 1 stop bit. */ } outopt[0] = 44; - outopt[1] = 4; + outopt[1] = 104; outopt[2] = val; telnet_send_option(&port->tn_data, outopt, 3); break; @@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ } outopt[0] = 44; - outopt[1] = 5; + outopt[1] = 105; outopt[2] = val; telnet_send_option(&port->tn_data, outopt, 3); break;