Re: Serial port redirection

Jeffrey Altman
2003-12-04T17:52:58Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1010 bytes --]

Corey Minyard wrote:

> Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
>> The reality is RFC is experimental and not authoritative. The only
>> thing that really counts is what Cisco actually shipped in their IOS
>> implementation. Lucky me I actually have a terminal
>> server that implements it. If you look at the C-Kermit sources you
>> will see that the client is written to accept both values from the
>> server. You will also find that Cisco does not send the baudrates as
>> specified in the RFC but instead uses an enumeration.
>
>
> True. But if I had been lucky and had a terminal server, I would not
> have written ser2net :).
>
> So Cisco uses a enumeration? Do you think it is possible to make them
> compatible and do both in ser2net, or is it a non-issue?

Clients can use heuristics to determine which should be used. Servers
must choose one; but I would make a configurable option.

(The clock is off by one day 4 hours and 12 minutes. This causes your
e-mail to get lost way down in my queue.)

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3427 bytes --]