Re: Serial port redirection

[Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1010 bytes --]

Corey Minyard wrote:

> Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
>> The reality is RFC is experimental and not authoritative.  The only 
>> thing that really counts is what Cisco actually shipped in their IOS 
>> implementation.  Lucky me I actually have a terminal
>> server that implements it.  If you look at the C-Kermit sources you 
>> will see that the client is written to accept both values from the 
>> server.  You will also find that Cisco does not send the baudrates as 
>> specified in the RFC but instead uses an enumeration. 
>
>
> True.  But if I had been lucky and had a terminal server, I would not 
> have written ser2net :).
>
> So Cisco uses a enumeration?  Do you think it is possible to make them 
> compatible and do both in ser2net, or is it a non-issue?

Clients can use heuristics to determine which should be used.  Servers 
must choose one; but I would make a configurable option.

(The clock is off by one day 4 hours and 12 minutes.  This causes your 
e-mail to get lost way down in my queue.)



[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3427 bytes --]