From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: izumi Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG] Fix possible NULL pointer access in 8250 serial driver Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:28:37 +0900 Message-ID: <4626D3D5.2060408@soft.fujitsu.com> References: <46242DD2.7030207@soft.fujitsu.com> <20070416225206.cf7d8cd2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1176884513.3945.54.camel@kane-linux> <20070418191812.GA21211@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fgwmail8.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.38]:53777 "EHLO fgwmail8.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031096AbXDSDel (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:34:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070418191812.GA21211@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com Russell King wrote: > NAK. This means that you change the list of ports available on the > machine to be limited to only those which are currently open. Utterly > useless for debugging, where you normally want people to dump the > contents of /proc/tty/driver/*. > > The original patch was better. > Is the original patch sufficient? or is there anything we should correct? Taku Izumi