linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Serial 8250: clear the lsr_break_flag at open
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 08:23:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46373F42.4080305@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070501092933.GB18233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
>   
>> I'm having a hard time understanding why the lsr_break_flag
>> is necessary.
>>     
>
> Merely reading the LSR clears status bits.  We read the LSR repeatedly
> so that we can monitor the transmit FIFO when outputting serial console
> messages.
>
> This means that if you have a busy serial console, and you want to send
> it a sysrq request, there's a chance that the break flag in the LSR will
> be cleared by the transmit FIFO status polling code thereby being lost.
>
> So, we need to remember that status, and we do this via the lsr_break_flag.
>   
I should have said a little more.  I couldn't find anywhere in any docs
for this that said it was a destructive read.  I've done some experiments
and that seems to be the case, though.

So two things:

There are other bits in this register that also appear to be destroyed on
read: framing, parity, and overrun.  Should those be saved, too?

There are several places where the LSR is read and nothing is done
for this, in serial8250_start_tx, serial8250_backup_timeout, and
serial8250_tx_empty.  It seems like these would need to be handled,
too.

If this is really a problem, I'd be glad to generate another patch.

-corey

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-01 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30 22:08 Serial 8250: clear the lsr_break_flag at open Corey Minyard
2007-05-01  9:29 ` Russell King
2007-05-01 13:23   ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2007-05-03 12:08     ` Russell King
2007-05-04  3:43       ` Corey Minyard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46373F42.4080305@acm.org \
    --to=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).