From: Adam Simonelli <adamsimonelli@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ttynull: Add an option to allow ttynull to be used as a console device
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:52:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4647568.Icojqenx9y@nerdopolis2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8Wsi7_rvk346Snr@pathway.suse.cz>
On Monday, March 3, 2025 8:20:11 AM EST Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2025-02-26 08:39:23, Adam Simonelli wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:19:04 AM EST Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Mon 2025-02-24 07:39:14, adamsimonelli@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > From: Adam Simonelli <adamsimonelli@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > The new config option, CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE will allow ttynull to be
> > > > initialized by console_initcall() and selected as a possible console
> > > > device.
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/ttynull.c b/drivers/tty/ttynull.c
> > > > index 6b2f7208b564..ec3dd3fd41c0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tty/ttynull.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/ttynull.c
> > > > @@ -57,6 +57,13 @@ static struct tty_driver *ttynull_device(struct console *c, int *index)
> > > > static struct console ttynull_console = {
> > > > .name = "ttynull",
> > > > .device = ttynull_device,
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Match the index and flags from other boot consoles when CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE is
> > > > + * enabled, otherwise, use the default values for the index and flags.
> > > > + */
> > > > + .index = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE) ? -1 : 0,
> > >
> > > This should not be needed. "con->index" is always initialized to "0"
> > > for the default console, see:
> > >
> > OK, I had this in an #ifdef before, it was the cleanest way to set it to -1
> > that I could think of, other than the ifdef... If I still need this, I will try
> > to think of something else to set it to -1 when the option is enabled
>
> Ah, I was not clear enough. It should be perfectly fine to always
> statically initialize the value to -1. We should not need any
> #ifdef or IS_ENABLED.
>
> I mean to do:
>
> static struct console ttynull_console = {
> .name = "ttynull",
> .device = ttynull_device,
> .index = -1,
> };
>
> We might even do this in a separate patch. IMHO, it should have
> been done this way since the beginning.
>
OK, will do. This makes sense.
> > > static void try_enable_default_console(struct console *newcon)
> > > {
> > > if (newcon->index < 0)
> > > newcon->index = 0;
> > > [...]
> > > }
> > >
> > > > + .flags = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE) ? CON_PRINTBUFFER : 0,
> > >
> > > This does not make much sense to me.
> > >
> > > CON_PRINTBUFFER prevents duplicated output when the same device has
> > > already been registered as a boot console. But ttynull does not have
> > > a boot console variant. Also it is a "null" device. It never prints
> > > anything. The output could never be duplicated by definition.
> > >
> > OK, I was duplicating what I saw in other consoles. I can try to remove it
>
> Again, I was not clear enough. My primary concern was that it did not make
> much sense to use the IS_ENABLED() check and initialize the value
> different way.
>
> Anyway, I would omit the flag. It is a NULL device. It does not matter
> whether it prints existing (old) messages during registration or not.
>
Understood, this makes sense.
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > My proposal is to call:
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_DEFAULT_CONSOLE
> > > static int __init ttynull_default_console(void)
> > > {
> > > add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > console_initcall(ttynull_register);
> > > #endif
> > >
> > OK, actually in earlier revisions locally, I did actually have
> >
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > index dddb15f48d59..c1554a789de8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > @@ -3712,6 +3712,11 @@ void __init console_init(void)
> > initcall_t call;
> > initcall_entry_t *ce;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE
> > + if (!strstr(boot_command_line, "console="))
> > + add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);
>
> Good point! We should call add_preferred_console() only when
> the is no console= command line parameter. Otherwise, it could
> not get overridden by the command line.
>
> We could check "console_set_on_cmdline", similar to
> xenfb_make_preferred_console().
>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /* Setup the default TTY line discipline. */
> > n_tty_init();
> >
> > Which worked as far as I could tell, at least on x86. Not sure if that was the
> > right place,
>
> I would prefer to keep it in drivers/tty/ttynull.c when possible.
> The following might do the trick:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_DEFAULT_CONSOLE
> static int __init ttynull_default_console(void)
> {
> if (!console_set_on_cmdline)
> add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);
>
> return 0;
> }
> console_initcall(ttynull_register);
> #endif
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
Thanks for that, that works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 12:39 [PATCH v5 0/2] Optionally allow ttynull to be selected as a default console adamsimonelli
2025-02-24 12:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ttynull: Add an option to allow ttynull to be used as a console device adamsimonelli
2025-02-25 16:19 ` Petr Mladek
2025-02-26 13:39 ` Adam Simonelli
2025-02-26 19:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-28 4:39 ` Adam Simonelli
2025-02-28 18:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-03 13:20 ` Petr Mladek
2025-03-04 3:52 ` Adam Simonelli [this message]
2025-02-24 12:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] tty: Change order of ttynull to be linked sooner if enabled as a console adamsimonelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4647568.Icojqenx9y@nerdopolis2 \
--to=adamsimonelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox