From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:21:05 -0400 Message-ID: <46D89451.9050904@garzik.org> References: <20070831221105.2fce9023@the-village.bc.nu> <20070831.144115.48807246.davem@davemloft.net> <20070831231613.6b0fcdfd@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:37044 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751511AbXHaWVI (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:21:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070831231613.6b0fcdfd@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller wrote: > >> From: Alan Cox >> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:05 +0100 >> >>> Firstly some architecture maintainers still haven't updated their >>> platform for arbitary tty speeds. The kernel is going to start whining >>> and issuing warnings on your platform if you don't keep up with the >>> programme (its been 6 months). >> I took a look at this for sparc and I'm currently balking the same way >> you did :-) The current bit usage on sparc just don't work properly >> for what you're trying to do. > > I don't see a real problem. You aren't using > > c_cflags & CBAUD = 0x00001000 > > so that could become BOTHER. Pooh says: oh, bother! Jeff