From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] TTY: serial, fix locking imbalance Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4E7E187B.4060507@gmail.com> References: <1314818699-10873-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <20110922224653.GB21296@kroah.com> <4E7CD560.8010706@suse.cz> <20110923190840.GA31009@suse.de> <4E7CDC30.8070607@gmail.com> <20110923220440.GC30017@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:37839 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022Ab1IXRuz (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:50:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110923220440.GC30017@suse.de> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Jiri Slaby , Greg KH , Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Alan Cox On 09/24/2011 12:04 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:21:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> But if there are more trees depending on the tree, then OK, I will live >> with that ;). > > For the tty tree, I really doubt it, but I am not sure (rumor has it > that some people are basing on it, but that might just be rumor.) Ok, for the other uart patches I have, it would be convenient for me to have the possibility of rebase. Would you mind if I add something like uart-cleanup tree to the -next tree and will have the patches there until I send them to you? Just for the purpose of fine tuning (and rebasing) if something needs to be fixed in them. The code is so complex, that I'm afraid I omitted some semi-hidden dependency. And it would be great to fix patches like when I used to work with the -mm tree. thanks, -- js