From: Stanislav Kozina <skozina@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch for panic in n_tty_read()
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:41:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE886C6.7090606@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2781 bytes --]
Greg,
(my first suggested patch for Linux kernel, so please bear with me if I
don't follow process correctly. Thank you.)
We had few customers who met panics in n_tty_read() with following
backtrace:
#8 [ffff880018b8dcd0] page_fault at ffffffff814ddfe5
[exception RIP: n_tty_read+0x2c9]
<register output removed>
#9 [ffff880018b8dea0] tty_read at ffffffff81300b16
#10 [ffff880018b8def0] vfs_read at ffffffff81172f85
#11 [ffff880018b8df30] sys_read at ffffffff811730c1
#12 [ffff880018b8df80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8100b172
My patch for this panic is attached (tty_panic.patch), in short - I
believe that we need to hold &tty->read_lock while checking
tty->read_cnt in while-loop condition in n_tty_read() here:
1835 while (nr && tty->read_cnt) {
1836 int eol;
1837
1838 eol =
test_and_clear_bit(tty->read_tail,
1839 tty->read_flags);
1840 c = tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail];
1841 spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock,
flags);
We gave this patch to the customers, they were testing it for a month on
several tens of machines without being able to reproduce the problem.
Please can you integrate the patch into the kernel?
My testing
====
The patch pulls the spinlock out of the while loop. This makes
reset_buffer_flags() and others wait before changing either read_buf or
read_cnt. So this should solve the issue - the question is if this can
cause any deadlock.
I inserted the msleep(2000) when the lock is held. This should trigger
any deadlock of possible.
I found out that:
1) n_tty_read() runs when I e.g. log on the serial console
2) reset_buffer_flags() is running when I push CTRL+C on any terminal
That's why my plan was to log on serial console, and than (in shorter
time than 2 seconds) press CTRL+C on any terminal. I wrote a stap script
to verify that both functions were running, the stap script is attached.
And this is part of the output from attached stap script:
1336070859652 -> reset_buffer_flags (PID: 225)
1336070859652 <- reset_buffer_flags (PID: 225)
1336070859652 <- n_tty_read (PID: 7527, retval: -512)
1336070859652 -> n_tty_read (PID: 7527)
1336070859654 -> n_tty_read (PID: 7502)
1336070859654 <- n_tty_read (PID: 7502, retval: 53)
1336070867135 -> n_tty_read (PID: 7498)
1336070867135 <- n_tty_read (PID: 7498, retval: 1)
1336070868260 -> reset_buffer_flags (PID: 237)
1336070868260 <- reset_buffer_flags (PID: 237)
It's clear to see when we were in the msleep(2000) - it forced
n_tty_read to be delayed by 2 seconds in PID 7498. That's why even
reset_buffer_flags was not running.
[-- Attachment #2: tty_panic.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 987 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/char/n_tty.c b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
index 2e50f4d..ace0c19 100644
--- a/drivers/char/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
@@ -1813,13 +1813,13 @@ do_it_again:
if (tty->icanon) {
/* N.B. avoid overrun if nr == 0 */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
while (nr && tty->read_cnt) {
int eol;
eol = test_and_clear_bit(tty->read_tail,
tty->read_flags);
c = tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
tty->read_tail = ((tty->read_tail+1) &
(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1));
tty->read_cnt--;
@@ -1831,7 +1831,6 @@ do_it_again:
if (--tty->canon_data < 0)
tty->canon_data = 0;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->read_lock, flags);
if (!eol || (c != __DISABLED_CHAR)) {
if (tty_put_user(tty, c, b++)) {
@@ -1846,6 +1845,7 @@ do_it_again:
break;
}
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->read_lock, flags);
if (retval)
break;
} else {
[-- Attachment #3: trace.stp --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 511 bytes --]
probe kernel.function("reset_buffer_flags").call
{
printf("%d -> %s (PID: %d)\n", gettimeofday_ms(), probefunc(), pid());
}
probe kernel.function("reset_buffer_flags").return
{
printf("%d <- %s (PID: %d)\n", gettimeofday_ms(), probefunc(), pid());
}
probe kernel.function("n_tty_read").call
{
printf("%d -> %s (PID: %d)\n", gettimeofday_ms(), probefunc(), pid());
}
probe kernel.function("n_tty_read").return
{
printf("%d <- %s (PID: %d, retval: %d)\n", gettimeofday_ms(), probefunc(), pid(), $return)
}
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 15:41 Stanislav Kozina [this message]
2012-06-26 14:21 ` Patch for panic in n_tty_read() Alan Cox
2012-07-20 12:18 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-07-20 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2012-07-27 12:05 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-07-27 12:50 ` Alan Cox
2012-07-30 11:58 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-08 7:58 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-08 9:00 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-08 12:09 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-08 12:26 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-08 14:32 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-08 14:28 ` [PATCH V2] [tty] Fix possible race " Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-08 15:27 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-09 11:16 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-08-13 15:26 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-08-14 11:15 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-09 11:24 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-09 12:35 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-10 10:52 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-10 10:51 ` [PATCH] Remove BUG_ON from n_tty_read() Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-10 12:29 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-08-10 14:53 ` Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-10 14:38 ` [PATCH V2] " Stanislav Kozina
2012-08-16 7:52 ` Stanislav Kozina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE886C6.7090606@redhat.com \
--to=skozina@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).