From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Only wakeup the line discipline idle queue when queue is active
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:29:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E3FDFA.4070203@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355842130-15482-1-git-send-email-meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
On 12/18/2012 03:48 PM, Ivo Sieben wrote:
> Before waking up the tty line discipline idle queue first check if the queue is
> active (non empty). This prevents unnecessary entering the critical section in
> the wake_up() function and therefore avoid needless scheduling overhead on a
> PREEMPT_RT system caused by two processes being in the same critical section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Remark:
> This patch has kind of a long history... I first tried to prevent the critical
> section in the wakeup() function itself by a change in the scheduler. But after
> review remarks from Oleg Nesterov it turned out that using the
> waitqueue_active() was a much nicer way to prevent it. See also
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/25/159
>
> drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
> index c578229..e96d187 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ static void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
> return;
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
> - wake_up(&ld->wq_idle);
> +
> + if (waitqueue_active(&ld->wq_idle))
> + wake_up(&ld->wq_idle);
Looks good, but I would prefer the layer to provide us with
wake_up_if_active...
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-02 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 14:48 [PATCH] tty: Only wakeup the line discipline idle queue when queue is active Ivo Sieben
2013-01-02 9:29 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2013-01-02 11:43 ` Alan Cox
2013-01-02 15:21 ` Ivo Sieben
2013-01-02 19:06 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 9:49 ` Ivo Sieben
2013-01-03 18:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-15 9:16 ` Ivo Sieben
2013-01-15 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-16 8:13 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-01-16 9:16 ` Ivo Sieben
2013-01-16 10:41 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-01-16 12:02 ` Ivo Sieben
2013-01-17 10:56 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-01-18 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-21 2:56 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-01-21 7:20 ` Ivo Sieben
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E3FDFA.4070203@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meltedpianoman@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).