From: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tony@atomide.com,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Rajendra nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] driver: serial: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:37:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516501A0.4000004@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87obdnh6au.fsf@linaro.org>
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:37 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@ti.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Kevin,
>> On Friday 05 April 2013 11:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@ti.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional while using
>>>> "no_console_suspend" in the bootargs. With "no_console_suspend" used, we
>>>> should prevent the runtime suspend of the uart port which is getting used
>>>> as an console.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Rajendra nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
>>>> Tested on omap5430evm, omap4430sdp.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@ti.com>
>>> Rather than make these special checks inside the driver's runtime PM
>>> callbacks, you should just disable runtime PM (pm_runtime_disable())
>>>
>>> Then, this should be broken into 2 patches.
>>>
>>> 1) serial core: add the '->is_console' flag. (nit on naming: don't call
>>> it port_is_console, since the struct is already a uart_port)
>>>
>>> 2) In the OMAP UART driver's ->prepare callback, check the is_console flag
>>> and pm_runtime_disable() accordingly (then pm_runtime_enable() in
>>> the drivers's ->complete callback.
>>>
>>> Kevin
>> I was working on your above suggestions, but realised there is not
>> only console
>> uart which has the requirement of keeping the clocks enabled while going on
>> suspend.
>>
>> If you see arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi, there is a ocmcram which has
>> "no_idle_on_suspend" property used.
> Can you please ask the AM33xx folks how (and why) this is being used?
>
> I don't see/find a driver for this device in mainline, so without a
> driver this flag will not be used.
>
Looping in Vaibhav Bedia for ocmcram..
[Vaibhav]:
There is a discussion going on about a cleaner way of handling
ti, no_idle_on_suspend" part (as this is a sort of hack). We got a way
around for UART ($subject) by making serial core/driver handle this
for us.
But with this, we will delete codes around "no_idle_on_suspend" flag in
omap_device file.
But, we realised that its not only UART which requires the clocks to
be active
whie going for suspend. There is a dts entry for ocmcram also.
As Kevin also pointed out, we don't see a driver for this device in
mainline, It would be
great if you can explain how its getting used?
You can find the complete discussion on v3 here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/5/239
>> ocmcram: ocmcram@40300000 {
>> compatible = "ti,am3352-ocmcram";
>> reg =<0x40300000 0x10000>;
>> ti,hwmods = "ocmcram";
>> ti,no_idle_on_suspend;
>> };
>> This property gets checked in omap_device file and correspondingly
>> od->flags is set.
>>
>> Based on your above inputs, the patches which I cooked up is
>> inlined[1]. Though, the below
>> patches works fine for uart case. The patches will effect ocmcram case
>> and I am inling them
>> "just for discussion".
> Could you also have a look at Russell's suggestion for getting rid of
> the 'is_console' flag.
>
[Kevin]: Yes, will do that.
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
~Sourav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 13:15 [PATCHv3] driver: serial: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend" Sourav Poddar
2013-04-05 17:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-09 18:54 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-09 19:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-10 6:07 ` Sourav Poddar [this message]
2013-04-10 6:19 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-10 9:43 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-10 11:26 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-10 21:26 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-11 14:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-15 11:50 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-15 21:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-15 11:55 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-08 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 5:27 ` Sourav Poddar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516501A0.4000004@ti.com \
--to=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).