From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is tty->receive_room no longer usable w/ SMP?
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:04:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FC1A14.5080004@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ldgte5$kp1$1@ger.gmane.org>
On 02/12/2014 05:43 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> A couple serial drivers I maintain check the value of tty->receive_room
> to decide the max number of bytes to pull out of the UART's receive
> FIFO and shove into a flip buffer.
tty->receive_room is not part of the driver<->tty core interface.
> After checking tty->receive room to decide how many bytes to read, one
> of the drivers uses this sequence:
>
> tty_prepare_flip_string_flags(...)
^^^^^^^^^^^^
This was removed for 3.14.
> <fill up char buffer and flag buffer>
> tty_flip_buffer_push(...)
>
> The other uses
>
> for (i=0; i<count; ++i)
> uart_insert_char(...);
> tty_flip_buffer_push(...);
>
> But, starting with kernel 3.12.0, whenSMP is enabled, tty->receive_room
> is always 0 and never changes. With SMP disabled, it seems to work the
> way it always has.
Starting with 3.12, receive_room is only used for line disciplines that
don't use flow control between the tty core and the line discipline
receive_buf (only N_TTY uses flow control).
This is because the N_TTY flow-controlled interface is lockless and
tty->receive_room is not supportable locklessly.
> Is use of tty->receive room no longer supported for SMP kernels?
The use of tty->receive_room by drivers is not supported on any kernel.
> How _should_ a serial driver decide how many rx characters there are
> room for?
All of the flip buffer functions that reserve/use buffer space return
the space reserved/consumed. Is rx overflowing the flip buffers before
you can throttle the sender?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 22:43 Is tty->receive_room no longer usable w/ SMP? Grant Edwards
2014-02-13 1:04 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2014-02-13 2:27 ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-13 3:56 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-13 5:38 ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-13 15:30 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-13 17:52 ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-13 18:20 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-13 18:50 ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-13 19:09 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-13 19:46 ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-14 22:31 ` Grant Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FC1A14.5080004@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=grant.b.edwards@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).