From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ivan <athlon_@mail.ru>
Subject: Re: man termios
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:51:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532C51F3.8030205@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgNAkhg4-QLwQaVxve6KXR=yy0XQik_4+iz5XytE1d_6NjQaw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/21/2014 10:17 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> wrote:
>> On 03/21/2014 09:15 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/21/2014 12:21 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 03/21/2014 06:45 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>> Finally, if the 'count' parameter is less than MIN, read() may return
>>>>>> before
>>>>>> MIN bytes have been received, if 'count' bytes have been received.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. But it's not clear to me here: do you mean that something in the
>>>>> man page (or in TLPI) needs fixing?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, what I mean here is that read() may also _not_ return until MIN
>>>> bytes have
>>>> been received, even if 'count' bytes have been received.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ahh -- I see what you mean. And, it looks like there is a point here where
>>> Linux
>>> differs from POSIX and (at least) Solaris. See the current man-page text
>>> below,
>>> in particular the MIN>0, TIME>0 case. I've also attached a simple test
>>> program
>>> that I used, below.
>>>
>>> In noncanonical mode input is available immediately (without the
>>> user having to type a line-delimiter character), no input pro‐
>>> cessing is performed, and line editing is disabled. The settings
>>> of MIN (c_cc[VMIN]) and TIME (c_cc[VTIME]) determine the circum‐
>>> stances in which a read(2) completes; there are four distinct
>>> cases:
>>>
>>> MIN == 0; TIME == 0:
>>> If data is available, read(2) returns immediately, with
>>> the lesser of the number of bytes available, or the number
>>> of bytes requested. If no data is available, read(2)
>>> returns 0.
>>>
>>> MIN > 0; TIME == 0:
>>> read(2) blocks until MIN bytes are available, and returns
>>> up to the number of bytes requested.
>>>
>>> MIN == 0; TIME > 0:
>>> TIME specifies the limit for a timer in tenths of a sec‐
>>> ond. The timer is started when read(2) is called.
>>> read(2) returns either when at least one byte of data is
>>> available, or when the timer expires. If the timer
>>> expires without any input becoming available, read(2)
>>> returns 0. If data is already available at the time of
>>> the call to read() the call behaves as though the data was
>>> received immediately after the call.
>>>
>>> MIN > 0; TIME > 0:
>>> TIME specifies the limit for a timer in tenths of a sec‐
>>> ond. Once an initial byte of input becomes available, the
>>> timer is restarted after each further byte is received.
>>> read(2) returns when any of the following conditions is
>>> met:
>>>
>>> * MIN bytes have been received.
>>>
>>> * The interbyte timer expires.
>>>
>>> * The number of bytes requested by read(2) has been
>>> received. (POSIX does not specify this termination
>>> condition, and on some other implementations read()
>>> does not return in this case.)
>>>
>>> Because the timer is started only after the initial byte
>>> becomes available, at least one byte will be read. If
>>> data is already available at the time of the call to
>>> read() the call behaves as though the data was received
>>> immediately after the call.
>>>
>>> POSIX does not specify whether the setting of the O_NONBLOCK file
>>> status flag takes precedence over the MIN and TIME settings. If
>>> O_NONBLOCK is set, a read() in noncanonical mode may return imme‐
>>> diately, regardless of the setting of MIN or TIME. Furthermore,
>>> if no data is available, POSIX permits a read() in noncanonical
>>> mode to return either 0, or -1 with errno set to EAGAIN.
>>
>>
>> All looks good.
>
> Peter, do you agree that Linux appears to differ from POSIX here? (Not
> sure if you tried my test program to verify...)
I did run the test program to validate that it's observed behavior is that
implemented by Linux, with which I'm very familiar.
I don't have a test setup for other *nixes.
I would be interested to know the results of
./noncanonical 0 5 3 0
hello
and
./noncanonical 0 5 3 2
hel
on other platforms.
With respect to POSIX compliance, it's hard to say. I'm not sure the
spec contemplates the degenerate case where max bytes < MIN. And specifically
with regard to terminal i/o behavior, POSIX is essentially ex post facto,
and is really documenting existing behavior.
Other than the degenerate case of max bytes < MIN, is there any other
variation between Solaris and Linux in non-canonical mode?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-21 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-20 18:42 man termios Peter Hurley
2014-03-21 10:45 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-03-21 11:21 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-21 13:15 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-03-21 14:03 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-21 14:17 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-03-21 14:51 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2014-03-21 15:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-03-21 16:11 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-21 18:45 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532C51F3.8030205@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=athlon_@mail.ru \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).