From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Varka Bhadram Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: 8250: Add Mediatek UART driver Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:34:09 +0530 Message-ID: <53E0C839.3000808@gmail.com> References: <1407236054-30994-1-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> <1407236054-30994-3-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> <53E0C633.7060600@gmail.com> <1407240147.30675.29.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1407240147.30675.29.camel-wU3TRTJX3O1FGiH78xh5akvbDziVy8sZEvhb3Hwu1Ks@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Matthias Brugger , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, rdunlap-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, jslaby-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, heikki.krogerus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, paul.gortmaker-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org, asierra-AQeFf1F/bRxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, mwelling-EkmVulN54Sk@public.gmane.org, dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, m-karicheri2-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, jschultz-AQeFf1F/bRxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org, balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 08/05/2014 05:32 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 17:25 +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: >> On 08/05/2014 04:24 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> (...) >> >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include "8250.h" >>> + >> Better if we have includes in alphabetical order.. > > So 8250.h would be first and it wouldn't compile ??? > > Can we stick to serious critiques ? The local headers should be at the end of all includes..? -- Regards, Varka Bhadram.