From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Murali Karicheri Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] Revert "serial: uart: add hw flow control support configuration" Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:17:26 -0400 Message-ID: <540641F6.1050504@ti.com> References: <1409693975-1028-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <1409693975-1028-2-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <54063BA1.2030206@ti.com> <54063D96.30703@hurleysoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:46159 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326AbaIBWRV (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:17:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <54063D96.30703@hurleysoftware.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Hurley Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , One Thousand Gnomes , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring On 09/02/2014 05:58 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 09/02/2014 05:50 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote: >> Peter, >> >> On 09/02/2014 05:39 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: >>> Finally, this patch >>> supposes to fix existing bugs in the serial core for auto CTS-enabled >>> hardware, but does not include the class of hardware for which these >>> bugs exist. >> >> What is this? What class of hardware are you referring to? > > UART_CAP_AFE and UART_CAP_EFR hardware. > >> As discussed, I will send an updated patch for this as discussed.. > > Great. > > And since that patch will touch every single line this reverts (and more) > with a different solution, I see no reason not to back this out. > No Issues and I am fine with the revert. > Plus, as you can see, you're holding up progress. I need to make progress on the hardware that I deal with for which this patch was submitted :) Unfortunately this patch didn't get proper review before merge causing the issue. Just want to give right context. Regards, Murali > > Regards, > Peter Hurley >