From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm_serial: Use DT aliases
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:20:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54618077.9000108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54616F74.5010408@codeaurora.org>
On 11/10/2014 6:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 05:56 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 11/10/2014 11:42 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
>>> index 09364dd8cf3a..d1bc6b6cbc70 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
>>> @@ -1046,14 +1046,14 @@ static int msm_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> const struct of_device_id *id;
>>> int irq, line;
>>>
>>> - if (pdev->id == -1)
>>> - pdev->id = atomic_inc_return(&msm_uart_next_id) - 1;
>>> -
>>> if (pdev->dev.of_node)
>>> line = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial");
>>> else
>>> line = pdev->id;
>>>
>>> + if (line < 0)
>>> + line = atomic_inc_return(&msm_uart_next_id) - 1;
>>> +
>>> if (unlikely(line < 0 || line >= UART_NR))
>> Then this original check for "line < 0" can also be removed.
>>
>>
>
> Well this matches what was there before. It would do atomic_inc_return
> if the line was negative and then still check for a negative value. I
> don't mind removing it though. Perhaps we should use an ida?:
>
OK, you are right. If (pdev->id < -1) and (!pdev->dev.of_node) then
the check is still needed.
You could use an ida. Some drivers use a bit map. I really don't think
this should become a complicated algorithm though. If the rule is that
either all UARTS have an alias, or no UART has an alias, then I think
the patch could be something like the following.
This combines your original patch, plus your fix patch, plus making
the aliases all or nothing. Not tested, not even compiled.
What do you think?
Index: linux/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
+++ linux/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
@@ -1044,17 +1044,28 @@ static int msm_serial_probe(struct platf
struct resource *resource;
struct uart_port *port;
const struct of_device_id *id;
- int irq;
+ int irq, line;
+ static int no_prev_alias = 1;
- if (pdev->id == -1)
- pdev->id = atomic_inc_return(&msm_uart_next_id) - 1;
+ if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+ line = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial");
+ if (line < 0 && no_prev_alias)
+ line = atomic_inc_return(&msm_uart_next_id) - 1;
+ else
+ no_prev_alias = 0;
+ } else {
+ if (pdev->id < 0 && no_prev_alias)
+ line = atomic_inc_return(&msm_uart_next_id) - 1;
+ else
+ line = pdev->id;
+ }
- if (unlikely(pdev->id < 0 || pdev->id >= UART_NR))
+ if (unlikely(line < 0 || line >= UART_NR))
return -ENXIO;
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "msm_serial: detected port #%d\n", pdev->id);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "msm_serial: detected port #%d\n", line);
- port = get_port_from_line(pdev->id);
+ port = get_port_from_line(line);
port->dev = &pdev->dev;
msm_port = UART_TO_MSM(port);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-11 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 0:33 [PATCH] tty: serial: msm_serial: Use DT aliases Stephen Boyd
2014-11-07 4:44 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-10 23:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-11 2:20 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-11 2:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-07 6:40 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-07 6:42 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-07 9:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-07 21:35 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-08 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-10 18:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-10 19:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-11 1:56 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-11 2:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-11 3:20 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2014-11-12 18:14 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-13 19:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-14 0:46 ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-14 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-14 17:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-14 18:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-11 15:31 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54618077.9000108@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tyler.baker@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).