From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fix struct clk pointer comparing Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:42:45 -0800 Message-ID: <54EE33C5.5010701@codeaurora.org> References: <1424876018-17852-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20150225150349.GB8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150225175533.421.41831@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150225175533.421.41831@quantum> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette , Russell King - ARM Linux , Shawn Guo Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Thierry Reding , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 02/25/15 09:55, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Russell King - ARM Linux (2015-02-25 07:03:49) >> Case 1 applies in places like the Kirkwood I2S driver, and the iMX6 >> ethernet code, and it's these cases which need to be fixed. >> >> Case 2 applies in the Armada DRM driver, and these cases need not be >> "fixed". >> >> To put it a different way: case 1 is when you're testing to see whether >> two clocks refer to the same clock. case 2 is when you're testing >> whether the cached clk cookie is the same. > It looks like patches 2, 7 and 8 are correct in this series. I'll apply > them towards -rc2 if nobody objects. > > For patch 8 can't we use the alternative patch that I came up with before? I have a patch for sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c and drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c which I can send shortly. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project