From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Ungerer Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Remove 68328 driver Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:10:07 +1000 Message-ID: <568A530F.8020807@uclinux.org> References: <1449830170-15096-1-git-send-email-frederik.voelkel@fau.de> <1450438103-1059-1-git-send-email-frederik.voelkel@fau.de> <5689FD36.4020609@westnet.com.au> <20160104103031.655b6f61@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160104103031.655b6f61@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Linux/m68k , Geert Uytterhoeven , =?UTF-8?Q?Frederik_V=c3=b6lkel?= , Jiri Slaby , Greg KH , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de, Lukas Braun , uClinux development list List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 04/01/16 20:30, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000 > Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the >> architecture support for 68328 platforms? >> >> The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console >> that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless >> without this > > Probably we should - unless someone wants to stand up and say "actually > I'm using this with current kernels, need it, and I'll maintain it" > > Somehow I doubt anyone is. Yep, I suspect you are right. I can't even remember the last time a patch or improvement for 68328 came past me. Same goes for 68360 cpu/platform as well. Regards Greg