From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Hurley Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Remove 68328 driver Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:57:12 -0800 Message-ID: <5693ECF8.9020408@hurleysoftware.com> References: <1449830170-15096-1-git-send-email-frederik.voelkel@fau.de> <1450438103-1059-1-git-send-email-frederik.voelkel@fau.de> <5689FD36.4020609@westnet.com.au> <20160104103031.655b6f61@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <568A530F.8020807@uclinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <568A530F.8020807@uclinux.org> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Ungerer , One Thousand Gnomes , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux/m68k , =?UTF-8?Q?Frederik_V=c3=b6lkel?= , Jiri Slaby , Greg KH , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de, Lukas Braun , uClinux development list List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 01/04/2016 03:10 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 04/01/16 20:30, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000 >> Greg Ungerer wrote: >> >>> If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the >>> architecture support for 68328 platforms? >>> >>> The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console >>> that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless >>> without this >> >> Probably we should - unless someone wants to stand up and say "actually >> I'm using this with current kernels, need it, and I'll maintain it" >> >> Somehow I doubt anyone is. > > Yep, I suspect you are right. > I can't even remember the last time a patch or improvement > for 68328 came past me. Same goes for 68360 cpu/platform > as well. And none of it builds (and there's no build coverage in arch/m68k/configs) Regards, Peter Hurley