From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:27:12 -0800 Message-ID: <569F28C0.9050605@roeck-us.net> References: <20160109182908.GB29967@kroah.com> <20160111083536.GB8070@sudip-pc> <20160111111101.GA18945@roeck-us.net> <5693C553.7050400@windriver.com> <5695E207.9080309@roeck-us.net> <1452663850.8586.3.camel@perches.com> <20160113103246.GB26117@sudip-pc> <569D1496.5080402@roeck-us.net> <20160118170423.GA25394@sudip-laptop> <569D1E2E.4070209@roeck-us.net> <20160120055123.GA3747@sudip-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160120055123.GA3747@sudip-pc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Joe Perches , Paul Gortmaker , postmaster , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nicolas Ferre , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 01/19/2016 09:51 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:17:34AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 01/18/2016 09:04 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list. >>>>>>> My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org). >>>>>>> I could set up a managed list there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org >>>>> >>>>> yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that >>>>> list then it will not look nice. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and, >>>> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned. >>> >>> Great. I am subscribing to it. >>> >> >> Let's check on the list first. I'll send am e-mail. > > I guess no reply means we can use the list... > Let's wait until tomorrow; then I'll try to reach the vger majordomo maintainer again as well as the vger postmaster. We'll need something from there - at the very least we'll need to get a new list owner. Of course, it would help if someone listening in to this thread knows how to contact an actual person controlling vger.kernel.org. Guenter