From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: jsm_tty: Deletion of a null pointer check in two functions? Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:14:30 +0100 Message-ID: <5e7d7252-16d8-0232-c78a-8e01f89e52d8@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5c78db97-88f5-8655-9a47-eeee0a043fba@users.sourceforge.net> <1511976187.19952.65.camel@perches.com> <20171129173504.GA20581@kroah.com> <1511977896.19952.69.camel@perches.com> <20171129180528.GA24705@kroah.com> <089a4b85-64e8-cb4a-c5f8-9abb2556e5e5@users.sourceforge.net> <8ae240fa-7f77-8f4c-225c-853cdda73a67@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <817fcf72-cd9d-bf5b-ce83-ce2844e3e901@users.sourceforge.net> <533d608d-c502-824f-9c79-880e387f4d09@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <533d608d-c502-824f-9c79-880e387f4d09@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , Jiri Slaby , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org > So, what do you prefer? Send it yourself, I became concerned that “my patch” would not get picked up because of Greg's communication settings (for my initial messages when they do not get resent by other contributors). > or want me to send it with your sign-off too? (since was your idea). I would prefer this variant because I assume that the chances for integration are higher for the discussed small source code adjustment. I guess that the tag “Suggested-by” would be sufficient in this case. Regards, Markus