From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] tty: serial: add DT bindings and serial driver for the SiFive FU540 UART Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 11:57:18 -0700 Message-ID: <7hsgtwlm5t.fsf@baylibre.com> References: <20190413020111.23400-1-paul.walmsley@sifive.com> <7hmukmew5j.fsf@baylibre.com> <883f3d5f-9b04-1435-30d3-2b48ab7eb76d@wdc.com> <7h5zr9dcsi.fsf@baylibre.com> <7htvetbupi.fsf@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Paul Walmsley writes: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Looks like Paul has so far only tested this with BBL + FSBL, so I think >> I'll wait to hear from him how that setup might be different from using >> OpenSBI + u-boot. > > I'd recommend testing the DT patches with BBL and the open-source FSBL. > That's the traditional way of booting RISC-V Linux systems. OK, but as you know, not the tradiaional way of booting most other linux systems. ;) I'm working on getting RISC-V supported in kernelCI in a fully-automated way, and I don't currently have the time to add add support for BBL+FSBL to kernelCI automation tooling, so having u-boot support is the best way to get support in kernelCI, IMO. Kevin