linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tty: sysrq: Use printk_force_console context on __handle_sysrq
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 22:41:50 +0106	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84pln9e53d.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105-printk-loud-con-v2-2-bd3ecdf7b0e4@suse.com>

On 2024-11-05, Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> wrote:
> By using the printk_force_console the loglevel workaround can be removed.
> The workaround existed to always send the sysrq header message to all
> consoles not matter what was the current loglevel, but it won't work for
> deferred messages, since the loglevel can be restore before the message
> is printed, suppressing the message that wasn't supposed to be
> suppressed by the workaround.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-05 19:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: Add force_con printk flag to not suppress sysrq header msgs Marcos Paulo de Souza
2024-11-05 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] printk: Introduce FORCE_CON flag Marcos Paulo de Souza
2024-11-05 21:34   ` John Ogness
2024-11-06  1:04     ` Marcos Paulo de Souza
2024-11-07 15:22   ` Petr Mladek
2024-11-05 19:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tty: sysrq: Use printk_force_console context on __handle_sysrq Marcos Paulo de Souza
2024-11-05 21:35   ` John Ogness [this message]
2024-11-07 15:27   ` Petr Mladek
2024-11-07 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: Add force_con printk flag to not suppress sysrq header msgs Petr Mladek
2024-11-07 16:16   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-11-11 13:37   ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84pln9e53d.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).