From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:45:21 +0100 Message-ID: <8737uyhaji.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <1387309071-22382-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <1449700088-28076-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <1449700088-28076-2-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Ianovich Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Heikki Krogerus , James Cameron , Alexandre Belloni , Rob Herring , Ulf Hansson , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Andy Shevchenko , Arnd Bergmann , Paul Gortmaker , Scott Wood , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Paul Burton , Joachim Eastwood , Mans Rullgard , Masahiro Yamada , Peter Hurley , linux-arm-k List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Sergei Ianovich writes: > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. > > Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of > 8250_core driver. > > Workaround for Erratum #19 according to Marvel(R) PXA270M Processor > Specification Update (April 19, 2010) is dropped. 8250_core reads > from FIFO immediately after checking DR bit in LSR. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus > Reviewed-by: James Cameron > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik I was wondering if this should go through pxa tree, or through serial tree ? Cheers. -- Robert