From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tony@atomide.com,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm: mach-omap2: remove "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND" check
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:03:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nf31opn.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5170434C.7040706@ti.com> (Sourav Poddar's message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:32:36 +0530")
Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> writes:
> On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:35 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> Remove the "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND" check, since UART was the only one making
>>> use of it. Now serial core/driver takes care of the case when "no_console_suspend"
>>> is used in the bootargs and you need to keep the clock enable for console even while suspend.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@ti.com>
>> NAK. This patch will break many things...
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c | 7 +------
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
>>> index 381be7a..d6dce8f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
>>> @@ -620,11 +620,8 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>> ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
>>>
>>> if (!ret&& !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
>>> - if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) {
>>> - if (!(od->flags& OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND))
>>> - omap_device_idle(pdev);
>> Why did you remove the omap_device_idle() here?
> This patch is used along with patch3 to get rid of the issue. I posted
> them as a
> seperate patch beacuse of the subject line as one goes under drivers/*
> and the other
> arm/mach-omap2/*..
>
> This check was only valid for UART, and if od->flags is set to the
> "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND" flag, then UART will not be idled.
correct, but *every other device* would be idled (if not already idle.)
> But now, we no longer depend on od->flag value to prevent idling of
> our console UART as the prepare/complete apis will take care of them.
Right, so removing the check on od->flags is fine, but what I asked
about is why you removed the omap_device_idle() call.
Remember that this code is called for *every* omap_device during
suspend, not just UART.
What you did stops *every* device from being idled during suspend.
You didn't read my whole message. Specifically this part:
>> Note that the check is for when the flag is *not* set, so this patch
>> changes behavior for all the drivers that do not use
>> _NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND. I think that's the opposite of what you intended.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 11:34 [PATCH 0/6] Serial Omap fixes and cleanups Sourav Poddar
2013-04-17 11:34 ` [PATCH 1/6] driver: tty: serial: Move "uart_console" def to core header file Sourav Poddar
2013-04-17 11:34 ` [RFT/PATCH 2/6] driver: serial: mpc52xx_uart: Remove "uart_console" defintion Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 3:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-18 5:17 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 10:51 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-17 11:34 ` [PATCH 3/6] driver: serial: omap: add prepare/complete callback for "no_console_suspend" case Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 3:58 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-18 12:07 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 13:06 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-18 17:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-18 18:11 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 21:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-17 11:34 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm: mach-omap2: remove "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND" check Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 18:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-18 19:02 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 22:03 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2013-04-19 13:55 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-19 14:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-22 5:50 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-17 11:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm: dts: am33xx: Remove "ti,no_idle_on_suspend" property Sourav Poddar
2013-04-17 11:34 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm: mach-omap2: Remove "no_console_suspend" Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-18 19:09 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 18:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-18 19:11 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-18 18:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] Serial Omap fixes and cleanups Kevin Hilman
2013-04-18 19:17 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-19 12:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-04-19 14:04 ` Sourav Poddar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874nf31opn.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).