linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Partha Basak <p-basak2@ti.com>,
	Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/16] OMAP2+: UART: Enable back uart clocks with runtime API for early console
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:52:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAL8m4wzT-ecmVeU--EQGF1PxuZuB6WZj54MmVAk-kCtFUcUSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871uuhn4kw.fsf@ti.com>

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
> Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>>> "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> For the early console probing we had avoided hwmod reset and idling
>>>> and uart was idled using hwmod API and enabled back using omap_device API
>>>> after omap_device registration.
>>>>
>>>> Now since we are using runtime API's to enable back uart, move hwmod
>>>> idling and use runtime API to enable back UART.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Now that the driver is using runtime PM.  Why do we still need
>>> HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE and HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET?
>>>
>>> The comment in the code says:
>>>
>>>                /*
>>>                 * During UART early init, device need to be probed
>>>                 * to determine SoC specific init before omap_device
>>>                 * is ready.  Therefore, don't allow idle here
>>>                 */
>>>
>>> This was true when using the 8250 driver because it was not using
>>> runtime PM so could not know how to (re)enable the device.
>>>
>>> However, since the driver is now runtime PM adapted, any device access
>>> should be contained within a runtime PM get/put block, so there should
>>> no longer be a reason not allow the IP blocks to be reset during boot.
>>>
>>
>> Forgot to add, this is still needed for
>> earlyprintk(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) use case,
>
> Ah, right.  I forgot about that.  Please update the changelog (and
> comment in the code) to reflect that.
>
>> The initial boot prints until a console driver is available is from
>> "arch/arm/kernel/early_printk.c" which does a tx on uart console
>> and relies on configuration from bootloader.
>>
>> during bootup earlyprink does a tx on uart console and if  uart driver
>> is not available yet
>> uart reset or idle done by hwmod layer can cause boot failures.
>>
>> --> put_char from earlyprintk.c
>>      --> reset/idle from hwmod layer
>>           --> put_char from earlyprintk.c
>>
>>
>> So console_uart reset or clock gating must be done only after uart
>> driver is available or be prevented using these available hwmod_flags.
>
> So why not leave the driver out of it and solve it like the current code
> does?
>
> The current codes use the hwmod flags, then waits until the UART driver
> is available (after omap_device_build) and uses omap_hwmod_idle() to do
> an clean idle of the device.
>
> Notably this is inside a console_lock/console_unlock block so that
> prints are buffered.
>
> The current code then does an omap_device_enable() to re-enable the
> device, but you shouldn't need that after the driver is converted to
> runtime PM.

Yes similar approach here, We are not doing hwmod idle
until console driver is available, once omap-serial is available
from probe doing hwmod_idle* and then get_sync.

hwmod idle in serial.c will still cause problems if ealryprintk tries to print
until omap-uart console driver is not available, as now with rumtime adaptation
only driver can enable back clocks. So have added a function pointer
to pdata which
calls hwmod_idle implemented in serial.c calling omap_hwmod_idle.

--
Thanks,
Govindraj.R

*function pointer implemented in serial.c not directly calling
omap_hmwod_idle API.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30 11:02 [PATCH v6 10/16] OMAP2+: UART: Modify omap_uart_can_sleep function Govindraj.R
2011-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] OMAP2+: UART: Move errata handling from serial.c to omap-serial Govindraj.R
2011-10-11 21:01   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-12 10:43     ` Govindraj
2011-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] OMAP2+: UART: Allow UART parameters to be configured from board file Govindraj.R
2011-10-11 18:53   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-12 10:44     ` Govindraj
2011-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] OMAP2+: UART: Make the RX_TIMEOUT for DMA configurable for each UART Govindraj.R
2011-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] OMAP2+: UART: Take console_lock in suspend path if not taken Govindraj.R
2011-10-11 19:01   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-12 11:23     ` Govindraj
2011-10-12 23:47       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-13  1:11         ` Govindraj
2011-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] OMAP2+: UART: Enable back uart clocks with runtime API for early console Govindraj.R
2011-10-11 21:06   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-12 14:04     ` Govindraj
2011-10-13  0:00       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-13  1:22         ` Govindraj [this message]
2011-10-13 21:01           ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-14 14:18             ` Govindraj
2011-10-14 17:12               ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-30 11:02 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] OMAP2+: UART: Do not gate uart clocks if used for debug_prints Govindraj.R
2011-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] OMAP2+: UART: Modify omap_uart_can_sleep function Kevin Hilman
2011-10-12 13:38   ` Govindraj
2011-10-12 19:41     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-13  1:09       ` Govindraj
2011-10-13  6:59         ` Jean Pihet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAL8m4wzT-ecmVeU--EQGF1PxuZuB6WZj54MmVAk-kCtFUcUSg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=govindraj.ti@gmail.com \
    --cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p-basak2@ti.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).