From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Guillaume Jaunet <guillaume.jaunet@stericsson.com>,
Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <par-gunnar.hjalmdahl@stericsson.com>,
Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@linaro.org>,
Matthias Locher <matthias.locher@stericsson.com>,
"Rajanikanth H.V" <rajanikanth.hv@stericsson.com>,
Christophe Arnal <christophe.arnal@stericsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: pl011: allow very high baudrates
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:52:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdakLAPmD0TQwe2VNhdePDuFv2KXD2U1xoP1C0axkx2p7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921162543.1ed18775@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> Untested but I suspect the following may help
Nope it doesn't, it's not this part that goes wrong, it's the call to
tty_termios_encode_baud_rate() that is the problem, not how it
gets called. It's that function that fuzzes and "snaps" the baudrate
to some rough-fit speed and screws things up for me.
But I looked a bit at the patch as such.
It doesn't compile, but when I fix it like this:
> - if (baud >= min && baud <= max)
> + if (baud >= min && baud <= max) {
> + tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(tty, baud, baud);
s/tty/termios/
Then it compiles, but regresses.
What's going wrong is that the termios encoding of zero does
not happen anymore, for baudrate 0, i.e whereas we used to
encode 0 into termios and then return 9600 this encodes
9600 and returns 9600.
So if I handle baudrate 9600 specially instead like this it works:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index 7d9fbb8..a2442fb 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -351,8 +351,9 @@ uart_get_baud_rate(struct uart_port *port, struct
ktermios *termios,
else if (flags == UPF_SPD_WARP)
altbaud = 460800;
+ baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(termios);
+
for (try = 0; try < 2; try++) {
- baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(termios);
/*
* The spd_hi, spd_vhi, spd_shi, spd_warp kludge...
@@ -362,26 +363,27 @@ uart_get_baud_rate(struct uart_port *port,
struct ktermios *termios,
baud = altbaud;
/*
- * Special case: B0 rate.
+ * Special case: B0 rate. Note: this breaks if the
+ * device cannot support 9600 baud
*/
if (baud == 0) {
hung_up = 1;
- baud = 9600;
+ /* Encode zeroes to preserve semantics */
+ tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios, 0, 0);
+ return 9600;
}
- if (baud >= min && baud <= max)
+ if (baud >= min && baud <= max) {
+ tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios, baud, baud);
return baud;
+ }
/*
* Oops, the quotient was zero. Try again with
* the old baud rate if possible.
*/
- termios->c_cflag &= ~CBAUD;
if (old) {
baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(old);
- if (!hung_up)
- tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios,
- baud, baud);
old = NULL;
continue;
}
@@ -392,11 +394,9 @@ uart_get_baud_rate(struct uart_port *port, struct
ktermios *termios,
*/
if (!hung_up) {
if (baud <= min)
- tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios,
- min + 1, min + 1);
+ baud = min + 1;
else
- tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios,
- max - 1, max - 1);
+ baud = max - 1;
}
}
/* Should never happen */
(FWIW Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> for the twoliner)
But as mentioned I get the same errors...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 9:46 [PATCH 3/3] serial: pl011: allow very high baudrates Linus Walleij
2012-09-20 19:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 13:41 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-21 14:37 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 14:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 15:05 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 15:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 15:14 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2012-09-21 19:56 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 20:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-25 18:48 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-25 19:00 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-26 8:06 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-26 10:04 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdakLAPmD0TQwe2VNhdePDuFv2KXD2U1xoP1C0axkx2p7A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anmar.oueja@linaro.org \
--cc=christophe.arnal@stericsson.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guillaume.jaunet@stericsson.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matthias.locher@stericsson.com \
--cc=par-gunnar.hjalmdahl@stericsson.com \
--cc=rajanikanth.hv@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).