From: Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Chanho Min <chanho0207@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: PL011: Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:41:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOAMb1CCoOWgab7NYYYRVjoQBoBx4XDeeLOBjJ4RzsBwRpXv6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaECZ5qtUVS=28eDyzLWvxx=mP6dWML5mYs9kwqnhEoJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com> wrote:
>> [Russell]
>>>Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
>>>adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
>>>Instead, what we seem to have ended up with are two new entries in
>>>platform data (which we're trying to get away from with DT):
>>>
>>>+ unsigned int dma_rx_poll_rate;
>>>+ unsigned int dma_rx_poll_timeout;
>>>Should we scale the polling interval according to baud
>>>rate?
>>
>> It is also our concern, I will suggest the proper way.
It was thought a way to reduce unnecessary cpu usage,
but, now we add dma_rx_poll_timeout to stop polling during idle.
I thought it is preferred the poll rate is decided by it's user than
auto scale.
because The required response to tty can be differ from platform to platform.
Some platform need fast response even if more cpu usage is needed,
but other platform will be enough to handle with slow response.
Any opinion will be appreciated.
Thanks
Chanho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 8:15 [PATCH v2] ARM: PL011: Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling Chanho Min
2013-01-28 8:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-29 2:41 ` Chanho Min [this message]
2013-01-29 10:57 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-30 0:53 ` Chanho Min
2013-01-30 2:53 ` Chanho Min
2013-01-31 20:33 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] <50efad8d.84fc440a.589e.ffff9546SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-01-11 18:34 ` [PATCH] " Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <50f107aa.894e420a.596a.ffffe3f6SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-01-14 0:04 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-14 0:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-14 6:46 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-14 7:27 ` Chanho Min
2013-01-14 8:41 ` Chanho Min
2013-01-22 12:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Chanho Min
2013-01-22 13:18 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-23 5:07 ` Chanho Min
2013-01-25 20:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-25 21:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOAMb1CCoOWgab7NYYYRVjoQBoBx4XDeeLOBjJ4RzsBwRpXv6Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chanho0207@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).