From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, michael@walle.cc,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, marex@denx.de,
u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: imx: Suppress false positive sysrq lockdep warning
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:10:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YV1Z8JslFiBSFGJF@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0bbe2832eb2dc3a7c32f3d484ab42208@denx.de>
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:15:33PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On 01/10/2021 10:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > No, no, no.
> >
> > Just replace this unlock with uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq() and do the
> > corresponding change in imx_uart_int(). The result is an even smaller
> > diff than what you're currently proposing and without any performance
> > penalty from dropping and reacquiring the lock.
>
> Just to be clear, this is something that I have also tried:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 8b121cd869e9..b652908f0bf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(&sport->port, (unsigned char)rx))
> + if (uart_prepare_sysrq_char(&sport->port, (unsigned char)rx))
> continue;
>
> if (unlikely(rx & URXD_ERR)) {
> @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
>
> ret = __imx_uart_rxint(irq, dev_id);
>
> - spin_unlock(&sport->port.lock);
> + uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq(&sport->port);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_uart_int(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock(&sport->port.lock);
> + uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq(&sport->port);
>
> return ret;
> }
> , but still get the lockdep warning in this case.
Ok, thanks for testing. The above is what I meant and it does fix the
false-positive lockdep splat which motivated
uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq() to be added in the first place.
Looking closer at the splat you reported (which you've edited quite
heavily), it becomes apparent that you are now hitting a different
locking issue. And it's not a false positive this time.
There a problem with the workqueue debugging code, which unless fixed at
the source, would prevent any console driver from queueing work while
holding a lock also taken in their write paths. And
tty_flip_buffer_push() is just one example of many.
I can easily reproduce the splat with another serial driver, and I've
also been able to trigger the actual deadlock.
I've prepared a patch that takes care of the workqueue state dumping,
which I'll send as a reply to this mail. Would you mind giving it a spin
with the imx driver as well?
Note that you may hit the other, false-positive, lockdep splat when
running with the workqueue fix, but the above diff should then address
that.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-06 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-01 10:18 [PATCH v3] serial: imx: Suppress false positive sysrq lockdep warning Fabio Estevam
2021-10-01 13:56 ` Johan Hovold
2021-10-01 14:48 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-10-02 2:15 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-10-06 8:10 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2021-10-06 8:11 ` [PATCH] workqueue: fix state-dump console deadlock Johan Hovold
2021-10-06 9:19 ` Petr Mladek
2021-10-06 10:07 ` Johan Hovold
2021-10-06 10:49 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-10-06 10:52 ` [PATCH v3] serial: imx: Suppress false positive sysrq lockdep warning Fabio Estevam
2021-10-06 12:02 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YV1Z8JslFiBSFGJF@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@denx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).