public inbox for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Adam Simonelli <adamsimonelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ttynull: Add an option to allow ttynull to be used as a console device
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:20:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8Wsi7_rvk346Snr@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10194425.EvYhyI6sBW@nerdopolis2>

On Wed 2025-02-26 08:39:23, Adam Simonelli wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:19:04 AM EST Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Mon 2025-02-24 07:39:14, adamsimonelli@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Adam Simonelli <adamsimonelli@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > The new config option, CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE will allow ttynull to be
> > > initialized by console_initcall() and selected as a possible console
> > > device.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/ttynull.c b/drivers/tty/ttynull.c
> > > index 6b2f7208b564..ec3dd3fd41c0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/ttynull.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/ttynull.c
> > > @@ -57,6 +57,13 @@ static struct tty_driver *ttynull_device(struct console *c, int *index)
> > >  static struct console ttynull_console = {
> > >  	.name = "ttynull",
> > >  	.device = ttynull_device,
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Match the index and flags from other boot consoles when CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE is
> > > +	 * enabled, otherwise, use the default values for the index and flags.
> > > +	*/
> > > +	.index = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE) ? -1 : 0,
> > 
> > This should not be needed. "con->index" is always initialized to "0"
> > for the default console, see:
> > 
> OK, I had this in an #ifdef before, it was the cleanest way to set it to -1
> that I could think of, other than the ifdef... If I still need this, I will try
> to think of something else to set it to -1 when the option is enabled

Ah, I was not clear enough. It should be perfectly fine to always
statically initialize the value to -1. We should not need any
#ifdef or IS_ENABLED.

I mean to do:

static struct console ttynull_console = {
	.name = "ttynull",
	.device = ttynull_device,
	.index = -1,
};

We might even do this in a separate patch. IMHO, it should have
been done this way since the beginning.

> > static void try_enable_default_console(struct console *newcon)
> > {
> > 	if (newcon->index < 0)
> > 		newcon->index = 0;
> > [...]
> > }
> > 
> > > +	.flags = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE) ? CON_PRINTBUFFER : 0,
> > 
> > This does not make much sense to me.
> > 
> > CON_PRINTBUFFER prevents duplicated output when the same device has
> > already been registered as a boot console. But ttynull does not have
> > a boot console variant. Also it is a "null" device. It never prints
> > anything. The output could never be duplicated by definition.
> > 
> OK, I was duplicating what I saw in other consoles. I can try to remove it

Again, I was not clear enough. My primary concern was that it did not make
much sense to use the IS_ENABLED() check and initialize the value
different way.

Anyway, I would omit the flag. It is a NULL device. It does not matter
whether it prints existing (old) messages during registration or not.

> > >  };
> > >  
> > My proposal is to call:
> > 
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_DEFAULT_CONSOLE
> > static int __init ttynull_default_console(void)
> > {
> > 	add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> > console_initcall(ttynull_register);
> > #endif
> > 
> OK, actually in earlier revisions locally, I did actually have
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index dddb15f48d59..c1554a789de8 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -3712,6 +3712,11 @@ void __init console_init(void)
>  	initcall_t call;
>  	initcall_entry_t *ce;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE
> +       if (!strstr(boot_command_line, "console="))
> +               add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);

Good point! We should call add_preferred_console() only when
the is no console= command line parameter. Otherwise, it could
not get overridden by the command line.

We could check "console_set_on_cmdline", similar to
xenfb_make_preferred_console().

> +#endif
> +
>  	/* Setup the default TTY line discipline. */
>  	n_tty_init();
> 
> Which worked as far as I could tell, at least on x86. Not sure if that was the
> right place,

I would prefer to keep it in drivers/tty/ttynull.c when possible.
The following might do the trick:

#ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_DEFAULT_CONSOLE
static int __init ttynull_default_console(void)
{
	if (!console_set_on_cmdline)
		add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);

	return 0;
}
console_initcall(ttynull_register);
#endif

Best Regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-03 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 12:39 [PATCH v5 0/2] Optionally allow ttynull to be selected as a default console adamsimonelli
2025-02-24 12:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ttynull: Add an option to allow ttynull to be used as a console device adamsimonelli
2025-02-25 16:19   ` Petr Mladek
2025-02-26 13:39     ` Adam Simonelli
2025-02-26 19:22       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-28  4:39         ` Adam Simonelli
2025-02-28 18:59           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-03 13:20       ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2025-03-04  3:52         ` Adam Simonelli
2025-02-24 12:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] tty: Change order of ttynull to be linked sooner if enabled as a console adamsimonelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8Wsi7_rvk346Snr@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=adamsimonelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox