From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EEA73D561; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 11:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741088944; cv=none; b=HvnuTqwPHt2IS37zMoSuXpbwpFoQktRaymYpDX3Q7JRRjIRbZVOvvamFiNMOxz7n60JhwtqJ7VxzhHREjCISp7c2up2U4aH7Xd5q/NAx9qnPlsmSW68hHDAXXIUFUVgjpNrBJmJ1BxG52COiV37NPdExvzxBM1/UkGpaw8wXAJg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741088944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I6AKIvYBVoI50+WthzWOWVzX/QNQgAy/x57wy0pi7+4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uomiSiY1Ols4pcs/xP4cIi1E0yDUl9qyXBxo5cKv8l5IgGxmOZ+M38200cE/DBBRYPr3pNOTdDC7LkMdBSk4lbMQ5kg2Ds0WTHSKKNfN914I7Wt21QyNyxiY2ivcxfVZ+8lPj0MOWjcv1NXgu362jC5tqDZcCv0gnVlIkX5X8KY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CqFiaiFZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CqFiaiFZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741088943; x=1772624943; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=I6AKIvYBVoI50+WthzWOWVzX/QNQgAy/x57wy0pi7+4=; b=CqFiaiFZWlwuSHKJdUZlFbTAAYxboSnJKV2/9bni2er6eAADlVfQJ3fh mq7/m9KsQG3XQtO7IyLlWQJyUmDPwBP/6H0zGXT1dov/Cm+ptGr+L5jXI HlIr1/6aM02xLKVV2vwHzJAyroR3+X7W0WN+IvhEeKUjeFHMRE1O+cstP 3DnBq3b9HMKVfW8qUQ3dUvVGdc5i0v2LuoBHZm/zqpQdFCjyXv8xs0Au5 8rfgbfwmXknkohPZXxnL+gsVh8NkzVZyITyIJC1HuU8GWW42cWUO4drSf FANtctiIPo1Ef/2eJXETe8kwQvW2c5Q5UuhsNxIiByyEPnbIhlfsXFRZp w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W1Ervz8kS9WpovA6vRKHlw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: k+P0mD6bT7e4l6idlyPayg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11362"; a="41713843" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,331,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="41713843" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2025 03:49:02 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4xB8vtM6Tf2sxARRtd+wzA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uC1esw9ASl+c8JYUarqujg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,331,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="118076348" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2025 03:49:01 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tpQld-0000000H71k-2rCc; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 13:48:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:48:57 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Inochi Amaoto Cc: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Yixun Lan , Longbin Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Add ACPI ID for Sophgo SG2044 UART Message-ID: References: <20250304070212.350155-1-inochiama@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:02:09PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > The UART on Sophgo SG2044 can be enumerated via ACPI. > > Add ACPI ID for it. > > This is fake ACPI ID. Please work with a vendor to issue the proper one. > Vendor ACPI ID registry has no records on Sophgo: > https://uefi.org/ACPI_ID_List?acpi_search=SophGo > > NAK. FWIW, the I2C thread has more insights and details: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304070212.350155-3-inochiama@gmail.com -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko