linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/21] PCI: MSI: Add helper function to set system wide MSI support
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 07:30:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUBfw2vrzc+GyAny@sunil-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874ji7zz7a.ffs@tglx>

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 08:29:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30 2023 at 23:24, Sunil V. L. wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:28:53PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Just noting related discussion :
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg57616.html
> >
> > The MSI controller on RISC-V (IMSIC) is optional for the platform. So,
> > when by default pci_msi_enable = 1 and the MSI controller is not
> > discovered, we get stack trace like below.
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > So, what I did was, by default call pci_no_msi() to disable MSI and then
> > call pci_set_msi() to enable when MSI controller is probed.
> 
> Your taste sensors should have gone out of range ...
> 
> > But I think Bjorn's suggestion to depend on PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI may be
> > better idea. In that case, we need to set bridge->msi_domain to true in
> > pci_create_root_bus(). Let me know what do you prefer or if I am
> > completely missing something here.
> 
> That's definitely more sensible, but as I said in the other thread, Marc
> is the one who did the PCI core/bridge setup magic and he is definitely
> in a better position to answer that bridge->msi_domain question.
> 
Thanks!. It looks like Marc introduced bridge->msi_domain in [1] for
exactly the same problem we have with RISC-V + ACPI. Let me remove this
hack and do similar to pci_host_common_probe() in next revision unless I
get objections to that approach.

Sorry, somehow my script didn't copy Marc in the series. Will make sure
I copy him explicitly in next revision.

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210330151145.997953-12-maz@kernel.org/

Thanks!
Sunil

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-31  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 20:23 [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller support Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/21] arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to pci-acpi.c Sunil V L
2023-10-26 16:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/21] RISC-V: ACPI: Implement PCI related functionality Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/21] ACPI: Kconfig: Introduce new option to support deferred GSI probe Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/21] ACPI: irq: Add support for deferred probe in acpi_register_gsi() Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/21] pnp.h: Return -EPROBE_DEFER for disabled IRQ resource in pnp_irq() Sunil V L
2024-02-01 18:00   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-02  8:48     ` Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/21] RISC-V: Kconfig: Select deferred GSI probe for ACPI systems Sunil V L
2023-10-26 17:04   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/21] serial: 8250_pnp: Add support for deferred probe Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/21] ACPI: pci_irq: Avoid warning for deferred probe in acpi_pci_irq_enable() Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/21] ACPI: scan.c: Add weak arch specific function to reorder the IRQCHIP probe Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/21] ACPI: RISC-V: Implement arch function to reorder irqchip probe entries Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/21] PCI: MSI: Add helper function to set system wide MSI support Sunil V L
2023-10-30 14:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-30 17:54     ` Sunil V L
2023-10-30 19:29       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-31  2:00         ` Sunil V L [this message]
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/21] PCI: pci-acpi.c: Return correct value from pcibios_alloc_irq() Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/21] irqchip: riscv-intc: Add ACPI support for AIA Sunil V L
2023-10-26 16:51   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-27 11:29     ` Sunil V L
2023-10-27 11:54       ` Sunil V L
2023-10-27 17:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-11-06 11:35       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/21] irqchip: riscv-imsic: Add ACPI support Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/21] irqchip: riscv-aplic: " Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/21] irqchip: irq-sifive-plic: " Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/21] ACPI: bus: Add RINTC IRQ model for RISC-V Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/21] irqchip: riscv-intc: Set ACPI irqmodel Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/21] ACPI: bus: Add acpi_riscv_init function Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/21] ACPI: RISC-V: Create APLIC platform device Sunil V L
2023-10-25 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/21] ACPI: RISC-V: Create PLIC " Sunil V L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZUBfw2vrzc+GyAny@sunil-laptop \
    --to=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).