From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CCFC2040AD for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744274014; cv=none; b=JC4dnR0u9QivWmFon+xcC1EtybHjP+qcNqKWOlMauhKL/+J2HTMikQjPq9246KsPOJkX0E5opIKT/tTCQ8lbroyAkrWkck2Y0UZoZMtWp9/3lUwbFwVvnlXIQfJrOTnpYydxtojTBdGi2IwWgw0t42J7U5A/LaJvzans60Mckpc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744274014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=clbT7Rpxg8FTLrjCtHscX9yBn69l5cFVOPlj7r5XSxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XAigIA3PespMMuTqeF5rBb0WtVge/+3BbZ1cbypSbv8MmyJaVn+JI3vNMZR3vfsE1bNVjhLAZkinkQSSw4+fScYQzPFh9If9BAlgPqPUjtxS8CSe+qithbTC/CyjgLsURtb0sLYiJvl5lj4JXjzT5LFzsDnhx+QPYwEfqIsXdxc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=Ms0fFMGT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="Ms0fFMGT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=fbDj bV2OkPZpVU8Z0SPcJP1FqdfVUUdC4pTcB+aFstg=; b=Ms0fFMGTUvuYO1zE1Jcg N3BTKOAUS/Zmpz2EhDQOW58spLVXktBCwnsgbkUC4hUBQrRbaBmkJxeZFigit+Lq NePi4VBoLD+4Q9USjUD3/pm9mWKWDu6ydDJUbtD47snuvHl/1tUUrvovemVDF6wi Sw1DQjg1ef+JWyzIrqqVRUwPPCWoLdkV23pC1bkw6DY0oi7y3nXOwrcVqZVRq2Xz 3o1eCAqBRU31HDyZU960LVSp03y/9FYMb8QZsiF0VFw0Vi78aR1hCNVGWZ/oalzn 2tDzjUmGTVx3a1xQt7HNlGbTFqTF9gUbf6sHiVVUPoBi+Ah8Oba0rS9cVYyIbl+t /w== Received: (qmail 812204 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2025 10:33:27 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 10 Apr 2025 10:33:27 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@iLqecGgyzMkgAwDPXyfYALbiJ46yNPq3 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:33:27 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: Simplify DMA-less RZ/N1 rule Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <90c7aa143beb6a28255b24e8ef8c96180d869cbb.1744271974.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lNR29TA6bIen2wLr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <90c7aa143beb6a28255b24e8ef8c96180d869cbb.1744271974.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> --lNR29TA6bIen2wLr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > - - enum: > - - renesas,r9a06g032-uart > - - renesas,r9a06g033-uart > + - {} What about simply dropping r9a06g033 which cannot run Linux (no RAM controller, only 6MB internal RAM) and there hasn't been any upstreaming effort for other OS in the last 7 years? And making the remaining r9a06g032 just const? Why should we allow everything there? Do we want to support that? --lNR29TA6bIen2wLr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmf3glQACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYxfBAAj50ZxD6LDwD1Xp0bj97nFngkA+Z1EdKDU5znTdNa1Pt2Y9UOKbS3W+C/ mbOwdOhXq5/BIr5bLZWOToBRdG5LDUPMJN0KrmmKnFFF7GjCRk0tLncPk8WGX4+C +2ckuSP2UtGo4DUwdhaXPP7ft73BhJ01/GQtT+MEA04z/Nb3u7n4sw61rGR1vWqF RTCizIbDo4KJDwmpT0hHeDe4xbWPO4x1hyhL8cDLGk/GJZ1FvZC9cfWxhAeUNTcK KRQ8pIu2VG9+/bYTzlloK+V274rrbSZ0OFK8cQ4f9tdW1N+VsCgF4iZVDkyMfMc9 4oBKqYwykUVFnWaZc8Yu5chDfkanJuz7CyWKXoCbtV+LGlpvN8zS6RSMx5K5r+jo TTQJbKofEP1x2bTYkHk8BodS7OGPQDVrGN1R7U0WX+0ix/JalXYcPJGbLWI/uc87 wf1FAt37h79248t0jWW7iJUzvtNS2WWhK1zRRoNYDHrxnRljBlGDVK9K4QK+Ye3q WZJxQELMIVl5zXgtsoELT0CkzrymB2pTyqTraUKRgXHAX3/PEvXB4VFiPQ3A/0Nj SdUa4R2l36juuUG5PjAUeBuISA35Vozkf3hmxYbTScTvLjDSxRryAaHa8yu300YZ RddhuA5h4F7ozg3I9PL6eGLV++d40lOE0QmCRLfkUW2L6iIPuHU= =IRSJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lNR29TA6bIen2wLr--