From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: liu.yec@h3c.com
Cc: daniel.thompson@linaro.org, dianders@chromium.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jason.wessel@windriver.com,
jirislaby@kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] kdb: Fix the deadlock issue in KDB debugging.
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 01:22:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg3WicDB8m9am7dJ@surfacebook.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403061109.3142580-1-liu.yec@h3c.com>
Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:11:09PM +0800, liu.yec@h3c.com kirjoitti:
> From: LiuYe <liu.yeC@h3c.com>
>
> Currently, if CONFIG_KDB_KEYBOARD is enabled, then kgdboc will
> attempt to use schedule_work() to provoke a keyboard reset when
> transitioning out of the debugger and back to normal operation.
> This can cause deadlock because schedule_work() is not NMI-safe.
>
> The stack trace below shows an example of the problem. In this
> case the master cpu is not running from NMI but it has parked
> the slave CPUs using an NMI and the parked CPUs is holding
> spinlocks needed by schedule_work().
> example:
> BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, namex/10450
> lock: 0xffff881ffe823980, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: namexx/21888, .owner_cpu: 1
> ffff881741d00000 ffff881741c01000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> ffff881740f58e78 ffff881741cffdd0 ffffffff8147a7fc ffff881740f58f20
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff81479e6d>] ? __schedule+0x16d/0xac0
> [<ffffffff8147a7fc>] ? schedule+0x3c/0x90
> [<ffffffff8147e71a>] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x10a/0x120
> [<ffffffff8147d22e>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
> [<ffffffff811c839b>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x1db/0x1e0
> [<ffffffff8147e743>] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x13/0x20
> [<ffffffff811c864a>] ? ep_poll+0x27a/0x3b0
> [<ffffffff8108c540>] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
> [<ffffffff811c99a8>] ? SyS_epoll_wait+0xb8/0xd0
> [<ffffffff8147f296>] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x75
> CPU: 0 PID: 10450 Comm: namex Tainted: G O 4.4.65 #1
> Hardware name: Insyde Purley/Type2 - Board Product Name1, BIOS 05.21.51.0036 07/19/2019
> 0000000000000000 ffff881ffe813c10 ffffffff8124e883 ffff881741c01000
> ffff881ffe823980 ffff881ffe813c38 ffffffff810a7f7f ffff881ffe823980
> 000000007d2b7cd0 0000000000000001 ffff881ffe813c68 ffffffff810a80e0
> Call Trace:
> <#DB> [<ffffffff8124e883>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
> [<ffffffff810a7f7f>] spin_dump+0x7f/0x100
> [<ffffffff810a80e0>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xa0/0x150
> [<ffffffff8147eb55>] _raw_spin_lock+0x15/0x20
> [<ffffffff8108c256>] try_to_wake_up+0x176/0x3d0
> [<ffffffff8108c4c5>] wake_up_process+0x15/0x20
> [<ffffffff8107b371>] insert_work+0x81/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8107b4e5>] __queue_work+0x135/0x390
> [<ffffffff8107b786>] queue_work_on+0x46/0x90
> [<ffffffff81313d28>] kgdboc_post_exp_handler+0x48/0x70
> [<ffffffff810ed488>] kgdb_cpu_enter+0x598/0x610
> [<ffffffff810ed6e2>] kgdb_handle_exception+0xf2/0x1f0
> [<ffffffff81054e21>] __kgdb_notify+0x71/0xd0
> [<ffffffff81054eb5>] kgdb_notify+0x35/0x70
> [<ffffffff81082e6a>] notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70
> [<ffffffff8108304d>] notify_die+0x3d/0x50
> [<ffffffff81017219>] do_int3+0x89/0x120
> [<ffffffff81480fb4>] int3+0x44/0x80
Ouch.
Please, read this
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#backtraces-in-commit-messages
and modify the commit message accordingly.
> We fix the problem by using irq_work to call schedule_work()
> instead of calling it directly. This is because we cannot
> resynchronize the keyboard state from the hardirq context
> provided by irq_work. This must be done from the task context
> in order to call the input subsystem.
>
> Therefore, we have to defer the work twice. First, safely
> switch from the debug trap context (similar to NMI) to the
> hardirq, and then switch from the hardirq to the system work queue.
> Signed-off-by: LiuYe <liu.yeC@h3c.com>
> Co-authored-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Correct tag is Co-developed-by, btw it's written in the same document the link
to which I provided a few lines above.
...
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/serial_core.h>
> +#include <linux/irq_work.h>
Please, keep it ordered (with visible context this should go at least before
module.h).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-28 2:56 [PATCH] kdb: Fix the deadlock issue in KDB debugging LiuYe
2024-02-28 12:05 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-01 3:30 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-01 10:59 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-12 8:37 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-12 9:57 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-12 10:04 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-12 10:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-13 1:22 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-13 14:17 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-14 7:06 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-14 13:09 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-15 9:59 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-16 2:34 ` [PATCH v1] " liu.yec
2024-03-20 16:28 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-21 2:26 ` [PATCH V3] " liu.yec
2024-03-21 7:38 ` Greg KH
2024-03-21 7:57 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-21 11:04 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-21 11:50 ` [PATCH V4] " liu.yec
2024-03-22 6:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-03-22 7:50 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-22 15:58 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-23 1:41 ` [PATCH V5] " liu.yec
2024-03-25 16:54 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-26 0:47 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-26 7:40 ` [PATCH V6] " liu.yec
2024-03-26 8:22 ` Greg KH
2024-03-26 8:54 ` [PATCH V7] " liu.yec
2024-04-02 12:58 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-04-03 6:11 ` [PATCH V8] " liu.yec
2024-04-03 13:58 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-04-03 22:22 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-04-08 1:44 ` LiuYe
2024-04-08 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-09 2:03 ` [PATCH V9] " liu.yec
2024-04-10 2:06 ` [PATCH V10] " liu.yec
2024-04-10 3:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-10 5:30 ` Greg KH
2024-04-10 5:54 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-04-10 5:59 ` Greg KH
2024-04-10 6:10 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-04-10 6:15 ` Greg KH
2024-04-10 6:30 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-04-10 7:18 ` [PATCH V11] " liu.yec
2024-04-10 8:24 ` 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH V10] " Greg KH
2024-04-10 8:38 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-02 20:44 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg3WicDB8m9am7dJ@surfacebook.localdomain \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.yec@h3c.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox