From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B96D149E0B; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714144338; cv=none; b=Lc+3SUnLEBjTVUffM9clPxunwNUBGLeyTJuMFx4Lt/3pfXiAOMIBNav3zSSH6HvR/CoXI1EuxBxsZ6BD1M+PhDUD3fj3FFVntT90M/adCjiU5qgBYrJp8RN/8k1RHv21G2VPyFEDZZXBMxAvMR0gUgxJ1Lj1cc+4YaS2HVodfDs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714144338; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Kr7zkCguCy7sd6KYvhCOQrIp4hZGHM6YPuaMgfJqxPc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P3UNlhAP0n0YKhSlqUKAAqmwPY1qsC1Y9luC6glzZNet85VTauJEwxSdE7HADBpxXWLKUCBzRTQQrT+inUlaYSFDDIYdpqm3OlAMRk24jLXiWXxIXBlFqFG9/T76yIiNIfmsMIKTLbW/LNWYKx6QWOtAADvbGr0HuOB7AsnxdRk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FxQYq5yi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FxQYq5yi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1714144337; x=1745680337; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Kr7zkCguCy7sd6KYvhCOQrIp4hZGHM6YPuaMgfJqxPc=; b=FxQYq5yiRC7LP4dgn4cZW60JU7I6AgCJew9LblKfe7HlCVKmhuTDhi1j 1kSZSgZhYeyFPLzZsF/t404YqCpJBlvE1fojlcXsnJDypQri+ZbjvTOpM znlBmNEOaNUK0mejty0SxKAnj46g9zc2zKISJDHXDyryUt9A1X4DfYS92 b0MszfmzP0HbLcwyzlNhaffsfgYxpo7cATOr4DrYdWFEWiQERpVOarY7o 7xxlasBAPuJK9bLdcFC3uh9VXU42PfxwD+GOTpUooqmOkwm/qA1iy9u57 U5C6vsgQCmvJnaUjmtwaznVAeA2VtjLQgOMa7kYaWoktgxVoBk6SFOmP2 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: aR5Lcj7oSTSCdvhb78Q6Rg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: m4Ior/4ISQaJhW5FXbAQxg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11056"; a="35269947" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,232,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="35269947" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2024 08:12:16 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1Vj0lcevTuKqc1CFgpQSqQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3IVWF+mHTcyfIYnSZvM35w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,232,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="25520161" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2024 08:12:11 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:11:56 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Claudiu , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com, tglx@linutronix.de, geert+renesas@glider.be, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, peng.fan@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea , Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2] serial: core: Call device_set_awake_path() for console port Message-ID: References: <20240425070936.547100-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:50:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The rest makes sense to me as we also have an internal hack to achieve > something similar in the case of Intel LPSS (8250_dw). > > But I like Tony to comment on this, from my perspective it's good: > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Yes nice, makes sense to me too: Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren