From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91C61D555; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726490812; cv=none; b=Snsbc6WKnbtxHv2xJflKL9Zn8AGtFrZdtfrVtQXEHSA0F5MLJk8CXs06N4FRO6uEdyuHBoTdhswlEBHxYC+0BQFgCQN9kdqEYKbEPR7Jua/8k0cF9usK/h37AdkKMKa6BqZI2drnapn5ebFuKbZjiUmBznKWplPh4aV2xq6OikY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726490812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pDvMc464eWrFnscvDjbF1OV66TiSCOmbPTRkOy7zly0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AN7sHXC5TXYRDV50+FJojpKbrlKuuidlRmZhTQ6BOXG4Woqq6BNFxUpZgWOmKHXyfxKKP3szWWSH49F7CUqEEpnArsX7BcaF9OWNo7MgXB4uPsrQgeiQE85eGtFbuPbA/dgdgrRydkkDhjQBgLFFWPS4cn/3cMEfDr4tJgd7C+s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Lv8oHpT/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Lv8oHpT/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726490811; x=1758026811; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pDvMc464eWrFnscvDjbF1OV66TiSCOmbPTRkOy7zly0=; b=Lv8oHpT//W/PfuCmcHaUiDtFaa+4YGzPFXSvzST5TOOlOY1lOJ8CbASB QY4eXDeH2tpvUN57CeH29WiGJOd190MJxSn7P04YggD74iE8/uacoY6nD i99oOPUsGAmXTD3QqEMNaPgQ86UZa+KcdXtBnNRdnk1a+dhFSJrceJ8q7 OLvWrrjenC4ILeT5xX+Xmkgz5Wk9FajNzdjGSdDabumfY23eSrZZT6+Vy E9vGJkf/CnFl71D+Wv2FQ3UTK0dhyAZ0Q2XV2kmBS14LNzEJKPZ8e2EXw ETDPFlbB98A6LawltRWWXT43Vf8TAVINQNjiU5Lm99C8cnuNcOCh5zMBY g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ershSdUXRuac5JHGNGb1+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ySsP8hW0R/WO88wH+T/4zw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11197"; a="42787731" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,233,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="42787731" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2024 05:46:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: S/iLLSEVTDOkGgDyyta/nw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vxsu8NGfRfarT4hIDHUkaw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,233,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="73451857" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2024 05:46:48 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sqB7t-00000009Sas-1VlS; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:46:45 +0300 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:46:44 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Serge Semin Cc: Ferry Toth , Viresh Kumar , Vinod Koul , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 1/6] dmaengine: dw: Add peripheral bus width verification Message-ID: References: <20240802075100.6475-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <20240802075100.6475-2-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:57:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:45:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > Okay that was the theory, now I made a hack patch, i.e. supply 0 in acpi.c in > the filter function and everything starts to work. So, my theory is correct. FWIW, I have reapplied the whole series and it seems fine, so the only regression is that I described in the previous replies. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko