From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: cov@codeaurora.org, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, rmikey@meta.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, usamaarif642@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: Re: arm64: csdlock at early boot due to slow serial (?)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 03:02:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGZVP8A2a3VVQwzt@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702172036.GC1039028@e132581.arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 06:20:36PM +0100, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Breno,
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 10:10:21AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Further debugging revealed the following sequence with the pl011 registers:
> >
> > 1) uart_console_write()
> > 2) REG_FR has BUSY | RXFE | TXFF for a while (~1k cpu_relax())
> > 3) RXFE and TXFF are cleaned, and BUSY stay on for another 17k-19k cpu_relax()
> >
> > Michael has reported a hardware issue where the BUSY bit could get
> > stuck (see commit d8a4995bcea1: "tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY
> > bit"), which is very similar. TXFE goes down, but BUSY is(?) still stuck for long.
> >
> > If I am having the same hardware issue, I suppose I need to change that logic
> > to exist the cpu_relax() loop by checking when Transmit FIFO Empty (TXFE) is 0
> > instead of BUSY.
> >
> > Anyway, any one familar with this weird behaviour?
>
> To be clear, I am not familiar with pl011 driver.
>
> For the first step, could you confirm the UART port is only used by
> Linux kernel?
>
> In some cases, if normal world and secure world share the same UART
> port, it can cause the UART state machine malfunction and long wait.
I don't know how to check it for sure, but, looking at the serial
console output, I don't see anything else using the UART. The only
output I see on the console at that time is coming from linux kernel.
Would you recommend any additional check?
Thanks for the reply,
--breno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 17:10 arm64: csdlock at early boot due to slow serial (?) Breno Leitao
2025-07-02 17:20 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-03 10:02 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-07-03 11:45 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-03 15:01 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-03 16:17 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-03 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-03 14:13 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-03 16:31 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-08 14:00 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-09 14:23 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-10 13:35 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-10 17:30 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-11 9:50 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-11 10:45 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-14 10:52 ` Leo Yan
2025-08-06 11:44 ` Nirmoy Das
2025-08-06 15:53 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGZVP8A2a3VVQwzt@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rmikey@meta.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).