Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] printk cleanup - part 2

[Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>]

On Fri 2025-11-28 09:52:24, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 04:18:40PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2025-11-21 15:50:32, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > > The first part can be found here[1]. The proposed changes do not
> > > change the functionality of printk, but were suggestions made by
> > > Petr Mladek. I already have more patches for a part 3 ,but I would like
> > > to see these ones merged first.
> > >
> > > I did the testing with VMs, checking suspend and resume cycles, and it worked
> > > as expected.
> > >
> > > Thanks for reviewing!
> >
> > > Marcos Paulo de Souza (4):
> > >       drivers: serial: kgdboc: Drop checks for CON_ENABLED and CON_BOOT
> > >       arch: um: kmsg_dump: Use console_is_usable
> > >       printk: Use console_is_usable on console_unblank
> >
> > These three patches were simple, straightforward, and ready for linux
> > next.
> >
> > I have comitted them into printk/linux.git, branch rework/nbcon-in-kdb.
> > I am going to push them for 6.19.
> 
> I pointed the kgdb test suite at this branch (as I did for the earlier
> part of the patchset, although I think I forgot to post about it).
> 
> The console coverage is fairly modest (I think just 8250 and PL011
> drivers, with and without earlycon) and the suite exercises features
> rather than crash resilience. Nevertheless and FWIW, the tests didn't
> pick up any regressions. Yay!

Great news! Thanks a lot for doing the test and sharing results.

Best Regards,
Petr