linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Lamanna <jlamanna@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Panin <pazke@centrinvest.ru>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SIIG DP CyberSerial 4S PCIe Support
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:05:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa4c40ff1003191905v30b41899pc9ee07892fd56b97@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318140630.f6768ee8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:45:08 +0300
> "Andrey Panin" <pazke@centrinvest.ru> wrote:
>
>> On 068, 03 09, 2010 at 07:09:21AM -0800, James Lamanna wrote:
>> > On Mar 9, 2010, at 6:15, "Andrey Panin" <pazke@centrinvest.ru> wrote:
>> >
>> > >On 067, 03 08, 2010 at 09:15:26PM -0800, James Lamanna wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>That's probably the case.
>> > >>It looks like 8250 doesn't know about this PCIe device at all.
>> > >>The Oxford PCI ID is not in pci_ids.h nor is the SIIG subsystem ID.
>> > >>I'll see if I can maybe work up a patch to support this device,
>> > >>since I've found
>> > >>the datasheet for the Oxford 4 port UART controller, but I may
>> > >>need some help.
>> > >>Or if anyone else (who has more experience with this) wants to
>> > >>formulate one,
>> > >>it would be greatly appreciated.
>> > >
>> > >Looks like you card can use existing code for Oxford Semiconductor
>> > >UARTs.
>> > >Can you test the attached patch for 2.6.33 ?
>> >
>> > Hi Andrey,
>> > Coincidentally I found your patch for 2.6.28 that I was able to
>> > backport to 2.6.24. The card seems to be working great!
>> > Is this patch in mainline now?
>>
>> Now I'm confused, because I can't remember SIIG related patches for 2.6.28.
>
> I'm confused too.  If someone had a patch which they think needs to be
> applied, please resend it?

I believe this was the patch/diff that I saw:
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.6/28/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c

So, from that, it looks like everything is in mainline. I had been
working with 2.6.24, which didn't have support.

-- James

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-20  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 19:07 SIIG DP CyberSerial 4S PCIe Support James Lamanna
2010-03-08 21:13 ` James Lamanna
2010-03-09  2:19   ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-09  5:15     ` James Lamanna
2010-03-09 14:15       ` Andrey Panin
2010-03-09 15:06         ` James Lamanna
2010-03-09 15:09         ` James Lamanna
2010-03-11 13:45           ` Andrey Panin
2010-03-18 21:06             ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-20  2:05               ` James Lamanna [this message]
2010-03-24  8:32                 ` Andrey Panin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa4c40ff1003191905v30b41899pc9ee07892fd56b97@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jlamanna@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pazke@centrinvest.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).