From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Toshiyuki Sato (Fujitsu)" <fj6611ie@fujitsu.com>,
'Karl Mehltretter' <kmehltretter@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev" <linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: amba-pl011: keep console clock enabled for atomic writes
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:09:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amnfcOod6ayqfNda@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pl0863t5.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
On Mon 2026-07-27 14:05:50, John Ogness wrote:
> Hi Toshiyuki,
>
> On 2026-07-27, "Toshiyuki Sato (Fujitsu)" <fj6611ie@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Regarding Petr's comment [1] as well, I'm concerned about the
> > potential impact when the clk remains enabled during periods without
> > console output.
>
> Can you elaborate on your concerns? Do you actually need such low-power
> _and_ kernel logging directly on serial?
Good point!
> > When creating nbcon patch, I saw a similar patch [2] from the past.
> > Have you considered coordinating with the clk subsystem implementation
> > for this?
>
> AFAICT there was no real justification for enabling clocks per write
> other than because we can. A lot has changed since 2013 and neither
> spin_locks nor raw_spin_locks are appropriate because atomic printing
> can occur in _any_ context (including NMI's).
>
> If the amba-pl011 insists on enabling clocks per write, I would
> recommend not implementing the write_atomic() callback. Since I assume a
> significant amount of users _will_ want atomic printing support, perhaps
> you can add a Kconfig to toggle building with clock-disabling and no
> atomic, or clock-always-on and atomic.
>
> Note that there is also CON_NBCON_ATOMIC_UNSAFE available, if the driver
> wants to somehow blindly enable clocks on panic in order to unsafely
> dump panic logs.
I personally vote for removing the enable_clock()/disable_clock()
from the console->write_*() callbacks. It was an interesting power
optimization. But I believe that the chance to see kernel messages
in critical situations is more important.
Also I guess that the serial port is _not_ used on devices powered
by baterry in production. It might be used when debugging and
it is exatly the situation where the messages are important.
Best Regards,
Petr
> John Ogness
>
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/al4KdsU9YLOmwDoV@pathway.suse.cz/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1359475526-17523-1-git-send-email-walimisdev@gmail.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 21:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: amba-pl011: fix console clock lifetime Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-24 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] serial: amba-pl011: unprepare console clock on unregister Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-24 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: amba-pl011: keep console clock enabled for atomic writes Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-27 2:46 ` Toshiyuki Sato (Fujitsu)
2026-07-27 11:59 ` John Ogness
2026-07-28 0:26 ` Toshiyuki Sato (Fujitsu)
2026-07-29 11:09 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amnfcOod6ayqfNda@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=fj6611ie@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox